Phil (Duck Dynasty) covered under 1st Amendment?
- Thread starter Catatonic
- Start date
- Status
oldngray
nowhere special
They will make money but why did they make the rifle a .22?
Catatonic
Nine Lives
I think I'll buy the same shotguns, rifles and pistols at a cheaper price without the Duck Commander marketing.
The rifle and pistol pictured are 22 caliber so just for plinking I guess.
I'll buy the AR-15 if I breakdown and buy a rifle.
I don't hunt so I never got around to buying a rifle.
Catatonic
Nine Lives
That is the appearance.
You are responsible for protecting your own privacy and respecting the privacy of others.
Last edited by a moderator:
rod
Retired 22 years
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
You don't have to be a redneck to like eating beaver.
A stalker, how cute.Nice score, you look thrilled.
wkmac
Well-Known Member
Nice score, you look thrilled.
Road,
That reflected far more on yourself than it did anyone else. Words are one thing but that was utterly childish. There were times when you complained of being watched and monitored more than others that I tried to see it from your POV but not anymore. You get what you deserve.
oldngray
nowhere special
Aren't you a bit old for him to stalk?
I think (not sure) that he hacked my Photobucket account. This stalking and invasion of privacy by this weirdo is making me rethink how I will use this website in the future.
"You are responsible for protecting your own privacy and respecting the privacy of others."
Hope that means there will be a strong penalty for this.
There is a penalty. That was way over the line and Roadrunner will now be posting from the mod queue.
I'm not defending him but you can't really accuse him of hacking your photobucket account. Your account is publicly available. You have it set up so the whole world can see it. If that isn't your intention you should probably review your photobucket privacy settings...
Last edited:
wkmac
Well-Known Member
If that's true Over, IMO that deserves the death penalty here at BC and the precedence for that has already been set IMO. My guess at the least is RR just got placed back in moderation and deservedly so.
Sorry your space was violated like that.
wkmac
Well-Known Member
Thought this would happen.
That may be true about the photo bucket Cheryl but what RR did was beyond the pale. Words, cartoons, vids, memes, that's fair game, I got no problem with some of the over-the-top use of those but this goes to a whole other level. It also brings in a innocent 3rd person (the other person in the pic) who was never a part of this whole matter to begin with. They had no say as to whether they become a part of this conversation or not. That is a type of force and coercion in my book.
I respect your decision but if BC were mine, RR would be gone. Using what are in effect intimidation tactics to suppress an individual's speech reflects a person that is selfish, greedy and tyrannical IMO.
Good thing for RR that you own this pop stand.
Catatonic
Nine Lives
This has caused me to review the "Privacy Setting" on the various sites I use.
The personal ones, I will clamp down on.
The business related ones, I will leave as public.
It is unfortunate that we have to go through this exercise but probably, as Cheryl says, a wise thing to do as well.
wkmac
Well-Known Member
Damn shame that tyrants make us have to shut ourselves off from one another.
- Status
