Seniority with same date

[Shifting Contents]

There is a driver in my center that worked here long ago, he got rehired and was issued the same id number he previously had. Of course his senority is reset.

I know this. But that wasn't part of the question.

 

[Shifting Contents]

Birth delivery time here.

You joke but that's how the military does it. Promotion date first, enlistment date, birth date. True seniority.

 

[UnfairProductionStandards]

You joke but that's how the military does it. Promotion date first, enlistment date, birth date. True seniority.

 

[UnfairProductionStandards]

friend. In sit
Its in your supplemeant, friend. In situations when multiple employees obtain full-time seniority on the same date, seniority ranking shall be determined based on their part-time seniority dates. Multiple employees having no part-time seniority will have ranking determined by lottery.

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

You joke but that's how the military does it. Promotion date first, enlistment date, birth date. True seniority.

Wut?

I was 8 years active duty and can tell you that what you posted is absolutely not the way it works.

 

[UnfairProductionStandards]

It's on page 245

Wut?

I was 8 years active duty and can tell you that what you posted is absolutely not the way it works.

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

It's on page 245

Wut?

 

[UnfairProductionStandards]

It's on page 245

It's on page 245, Also on page 183 It says, This supplemeant shall supersede or be additions to the corresponding Articals and/or Sections of the National Master United Parcel Service Agreemeant

 

[UnfairProductionStandards]

It's on page 245, Also on page 183 It says, This supplemeant shall supersede or be additions to the corresponding Articals and/or Sections of the National Master United Parcel Service Agreemeant

Central Region

 

[Shifting Contents]

Wut?

I was 8 years active duty and can tell you that what you posted is absolutely not the way it works.

I watched this play out with my one of my bases' command chief selections. One of the candidates was from our squadron so we were rooting for him and paying more attention than most low level enlisted people would.

He was 1.5 years older so he won won FYI.

You're misinformed again Dave.

 

[hyena]

What if they are both off the street hires?

In that case I have no idea I guess management would decide.

 

[hyena]

What if they are both off the street hires?

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

I watched this play out with my one of my bases' command chief selections. One of the candidates was from our squadron so we were rooting for him and paying more attention than most low level enlisted people would.

He was 1.5 years older so he won won FYI.

You're misinformed again Dave.

So their TIG and TIS were identical?

 

[Shifting Contents]

So their TIG and TIS were identical?

Yeah, through this ordeal they found out they were in brother flights in bmt and didn't know it.

Being that ones job was in support of the other they'd both been on similar and some of the same deployments, so they had nearly identical packets. Being that they were hard charging chiefs ther last bazillion EPRs were firewall 5s so they couldn't use those. And obviously they were the highest levels in their respective AFSCs so they couldn't use that either.

I admit that the odds of this happening is akin to winning the lottery but it did and I learned after that this was not the only case DOD wide in the history of the DOD so they do have a procedure.

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

Yeah, through this ordeal they found out they were in brother flights in bmt and didn't know it.

Being that ones job was in support of the other they'd both been on similar and some of the same deployments, so they had nearly identical packets. Being that they were hard charging chiefs ther last bazillion EPRs were firewall 5s so they couldn't use those.

I admit that the odds of this happening is akin to winning the lottery but it did and I learned after that this was not the only case DOD wide in the history of the DOD so they do have a procedure.

I apologize for my previous posts. Dave.

 

[Shifting Contents]

I apologize for my previous posts. Dave.

It's cool. At least you're not wrong as often or as annoying as bb58

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

It's cool. At least you're not wrong as often or as annoying as bb58

No comment.

 

[brown metal coffin]

We had two drivers who were hired on the same date. They flipped a coin to see who got seniority over the other one. The one who lost cried about that for 30 years. At the time they didn't realize what a big deal it was but when you take into consideration everything at UPS is ran by seniority it turned out to be a real big argument starter between those two.

That's what literally happened in our local. They flipped a coin also.

 

[Mugarolla]

friend. In sit

Its in your supplemeant, friend. In situations when multiple employees obtain full-time seniority on the same date, seniority ranking shall be determined based on their part-time seniority dates. Multiple employees having no part-time seniority will have ranking determined by lottery.

Don't know what supplement you're quoting, but this is not the Central.

 

[5habits100]

1. First day worked in the operation
2. Start time
3. Interview date
4. Interview time