The Derek Chauvin Trial

oldngray

oldngray

nowhere special
Baba gounj said:
Chauvin's attorney can claim that his client was denied impartial jury.
Hopefully the appeals court sees that and orders a change of venue.
Click to expand...
The judge knew it wasn't going to be a fair trial and expected it to be appealed. He was more worried about protecting himself from the rioters.
 
B

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
MAKAVELI said:
All 12 of them made up their minds after hearing all of the evidence.
Click to expand...

After, eh? You’re sure this juror hadn’t decided before? He had to lie to get on the jury for a reason.

85818AEC-B217-46F5-BD16-C6159F265291.png
 
Poop Head

Poop Head

Judge me.
Netsua 3:16 said:
Wally. Tell me, that you actually think anything will change during the appeal
Do you honestly believe that he’ll be declared innocent?
Cmon man.
Click to expand...
Theyll have a retrial after trump is president again. He'll be found innocent, and the BLMs will burn the cities again while the left says its trump's fault
 
DriveInDriveOut

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right

BREAKING! Chauvin Files for New Trial, Citing Juror Misconduct and Other Grounds – Law of Self Defense

lawofselfdefense.com lawofselfdefense.com

  • The failure of the court to allow a change of venue
  • The failure of the court to recognize that pre-trial publicity made a fair trial impossible.
  • The failure of the court to sequester the jury for the duration of the trial.
  • The State’s pervasive prosecutorial misconduct.
  • The failure of the court to order Floyd’s purported drug dealer Morries Hall, present with Floyd at the time of his arrest, to testify.
  • The claim that the court improperly instructed the jury on second-degree unintentional murder.
  • The failure of the court to prevent the State from presenting prejudicial cumulative evidence.
  • The failure of the court to prevent the State’s leading questioning of their witnesses.
  • The failure of the court to not require a record to be made of the many sidebars.

Further, the defense moved for what’s called a Schwartz hearing, where the verdict could be impeached (shown to be invalid) on the grounds of jury misconduct. This hearing would involve direct questioning of the jurors, usually by the judge with defense counsel and prosecutors in attendance but not directly participating in this questioning.

Presumably this jury misconduct claim is based upon recent revelations that juror #52, Brandon Mitchell, shown in the feature image, concealed his activist impartiality, including participation at George Floyd protests, from the court during his voir dire (jury selection).
 
MAKAVELI

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
DriveInDriveOut said:

BREAKING! Chauvin Files for New Trial, Citing Juror Misconduct and Other Grounds – Law of Self Defense

lawofselfdefense.com lawofselfdefense.com

  • The failure of the court to allow a change of venue
  • The failure of the court to recognize that pre-trial publicity made a fair trial impossible.
  • The failure of the court to sequester the jury for the duration of the trial.
  • The State’s pervasive prosecutorial misconduct.
  • The failure of the court to order Floyd’s purported drug dealer Morries Hall, present with Floyd at the time of his arrest, to testify.
  • The claim that the court improperly instructed the jury on second-degree unintentional murder.
  • The failure of the court to prevent the State from presenting prejudicial cumulative evidence.
  • The failure of the court to prevent the State’s leading questioning of their witnesses.
  • The failure of the court to not require a record to be made of the many sidebars.

Further, the defense moved for what’s called a Schwartz hearing, where the verdict could be impeached (shown to be invalid) on the grounds of jury misconduct. This hearing would involve direct questioning of the jurors, usually by the judge with defense counsel and prosecutors in attendance but not directly participating in this questioning.

Presumably this jury misconduct claim is based upon recent revelations that juror #52, Brandon Mitchell, shown in the feature image, concealed his activist impartiality, including participation at George Floyd protests, from the court during his voir dire (jury selection).
Click to expand...
tenor.gif
 
F

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
zubenelgenubi said:
Looks like the BLM activists on this forum are really nervous about the legal system working properly. Don't sweat so much boys. You'll short out your smart phones
zubenelgenubi said:
Looks like the BLM activists on this forum are really nervous about the legal system working properly. Don't sweat so much boys. You'll short out your smart phones.
Click to expand...
When the Right loses, they want a do-over.
Click to expand...
 
T

Tyrone Slothrop

Well-Known Member
Personally, I find it amazing that a white man can be convicted of murder for slowly killing a Black man while being filmed doing it. It is a time honored white privilege.

Try and convict him on tax fraud and put him in general population for 15-20.

Put the garbage away.
 
Top