El Correcto
god is dead
You keep saying that but I don’t think you even know what it means.The DC seditionist had to go.
Also did you cast your vote after January 6th. Lol?
You keep saying that but I don’t think you even know what it means.The DC seditionist had to go.
None of the three charges carry intent to murder. Ttku...
You keep saying that but I don’t think you even know what it means.
Also did you cast your vote after January 6th. Lol?
Yes and the jury was instructed by the judge on all 3. He was convicted on all 3 and there is no contradictory on any of the charges. Ttku...I never said that. Ttku. There's actually three separate layers that are at least mutually exclusive, and contradictory at most. 2nd degree murder in Minnesota requires intent to commit a felony, and a death resulting from it. In this case it would be unintentional murder while intentionally commiting a felony.
3rd degree murder is unintentional murder from a depraved disregard for human life. If you do not accept this as a different degree of culpability, then this charge is no different than 2nd degree murder, especially since there is almost no way you can commit a murder without an underlying felony of assault. If you accept this as a lower level of culpability than 2nd degree murder, you can't be guilty of both a higher and lower degree of culpability, it's mutually exclusive, and potentially contradictory.
2nd degree manslaughter requires yet another level of culpability, which is negligence. The statute states "consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm to another". So how can you consciously take a chance of causing and unintentionally cause the death of someone? This is contradictory.
Three different charges, three different levels of culpability and theories of intent or lack thereof. All equally true. Bollocks.
Yes and the jury was instructed by the judge on all 3. He was convicted on all 3 and there is no contradictory on any of the charges. Ttku...
EXPLAINER: Why is Chauvin unlikely to face maximum sentence?Yes and the jury was instructed by the judge on all 3. He was convicted on all 3 and there is no contradictory on any of the charges. Ttku...
No you didn't. Ttku.I just demonstrated the contradictions. Ttku. Lol.
Stacking of charges is nothing new. You're just mad it's against a white cop. LolI just demonstrated the contradictions. Ttku. Lol.
Fake news. You couldn't even quote one of the 12. Lol![]()
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
On Tuesday, a jury found Derek Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in a case that had sparked nationwide riots: The death of George Floyd. During the course of the trial, Judge Peter Cahill mentioned that the court case was getting...beckernews.com
The most obvious mistrial in the history of mistrials.
Stacking of charges is nothing new. You're just mad it's against a white cop. Lol
Bro, the judge approved of the charges. Get over it. Your boy will be doing time. LolYou're just mad the white cop didn't get the death penalty. You racist. Lol. And yes, I did demonstrate the contradiction. Sorry if it hurts to deal with ideas not spoon fed to you by your racist media overlords.
Only for one of them.Bro, the judge approved of the charges. Get over it. Your boy will be doing time. Lol
If you can't do the time don't do the crime. LolOnly for one of them.![]()
If you can't do the time don't do the crime. Lol
If can't do the time don't do the crime. Lol
Name the racist law that exists today.Racism is not secret and never has been. Whenever black people exercise political power, a lot of Americans feel threatened by that, accuse black people of violence, of mob rule, of cheating and they pass laws specifically to limit or combat that political power. This is done legally and quite out in the open.
Name the racist law that exists today.
He was convicted on all 3 charges. He will be doing more time than a plea. But keep on believing in your boy lolHe's likely to do less time than he was offering in his plea deal. Really a show trial, and waste of time and money.
Total nonsense.Didn't take a rocket surgeon to see where he was going with his preemptive election fraud narrative and to also take a guess at what might come after November 3 .
Trump has signaled he won't accept an election loss. Many of his voters agree.
U.S. election: What happens if Trump loses to Biden, but refuses to concede?
"President Donald Trump has refused to say he’d accept the results of the election in the event that he loses, and in the closing days of the race, some of his supporters have taken his faulty or unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud to heart.
At a packed outdoor rally in this battleground state Wednesday, Trump said the polls that show him trailing the Democratic nominee Joe Biden are “fake,” drawing boos from the crowd and raising their expectations of victory. He also said he feared voter fraud, which studies have repeatedly found to be extremely rare, and in most cases nonexistent.
“The biggest problem we have is if they cheat with the ballots. That's my biggest problem,” he told supporters at the Phoenix Goodyear Airport this week. “That's my only thing — that's the only thing I worry about.”
U.S. President Donald Trump is doubling down on claims that the upcoming election could be rigged, leading experts to sound the alarm over what could be the country’s first non-peaceful transition of power.
Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Trump would not commit to a peaceful transfer, should he lose to Democratic candidate Joe Biden on Nov. 3.
“Well we’re going to have to see what happens,” he said. “You know that I’ve been complaining about the ballots, the ballots are a disaster.”
“There won’t be a transfer, frankly,” he said. “There’ll be a continuation.”
On Friday, Trump again sowed doubt about the election results, saying the only way he would lose is “if there’s mischief.”