I love how you use the channel you love to hate on to prove that this verdict is legit.I love how so many here think this is fake news because everyone hates Trump lol
I love how you use the channel you love to hate on to prove that this verdict is legit.
Stay tuned for information dropping tomorrow.
That sounds like something Mike Lindell would say lolStay tuned for information dropping tomorrow.
Stay tuned for information dropping tomorrow.
And buy a pillow to cry on while you're at it.That sounds like something Mike Lindell would say lol
The RINO's are stampeding.
From many of the posts on this thread I think the MAGA folks are the ones cryingAnd buy a pillow to cry on while you're at it.
Her testimony was he penetrated her with his fingers, but couldn't confirm he penetrated her with his penis. That is why the rape charge was denied.I've followed this very little.
But her testimony said that he penetrated her against her will, yes?
The jury says abuse yes, rape no.
How does that definition make sense in any way?
I just don't understand.
I’m really not trying to go after that woman. I don’t know her, or the facts.Her testimony was he penetrated her with his fingers, but couldn't confirm he penetrated her with his penis. That is why the rape charge was denied.
Not a forgotten detail, she just couldn't swear to it under oath. Something about having her eyes closed and not knowing what was in her.I’m really not trying to go after that woman. I don’t know her, or the facts.
But wouldn’t the physics of getting a penis inside her make it kind of obvious whether or not that happened?
If it were me, I feel like that would be a detail that would have been hard to forget.
She says a camp counselor raped her when she was young. And a dentist. And an unnamed employer. And Harvey Weinstein. And Donald Trump. She just happens to get raped all over the place lol. Give me a break.I’m really not trying to go after that woman. I don’t know her, or the facts.
But wouldn’t the physics of getting a penis inside her make it kind of obvious whether or not that happened?
If it were me, I feel like that would be a detail that would have been hard to forget.
He's the best they have.
No matter what, all of you are defending him. That's TDS.No, they are saying, no matter what, we hate Trump
Ever see E. Jean Carroll when she was younger? Absolute stunner. Looked great then, but all of you see the 79 year-old version. It's pretty remarkable that all of his accusers have almost verbatim stories, and then there's that pesky Access Hollywood tape. Ever the Ego King, Trump pretty much confirmed that the tape was an accurate portrayal of his attitude towards women in his deposition. Oh, yeah, and E.Jean was hot enough that he actually mistook a picture of her for ex-wife Marla Maples, who has been remarkably silent since visting Trump Tower a few days after the 2016 victory.The RINO's are stampeding.
Have the trial in Arkansas, what is the outcome? You need more evidence than she said.No matter what, all of you are defending him. That's TDS.