THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

Up In Smoke

Well-Known Member
I've followed this very little.

But her testimony said that he penetrated her against her will, yes?
The jury says abuse yes, rape no.

How does that definition make sense in any way?
I just don't understand.
Her testimony was he penetrated her with his fingers, but couldn't confirm he penetrated her with his penis. That is why the rape charge was denied.
 

BadIdeaGuy

Moderator
Staff member
Her testimony was he penetrated her with his fingers, but couldn't confirm he penetrated her with his penis. That is why the rape charge was denied.
I’m really not trying to go after that woman. I don’t know her, or the facts.

But wouldn’t the physics of getting a penis inside her make it kind of obvious whether or not that happened?

If it were me, I feel like that would be a detail that would have been hard to forget.
 

Up In Smoke

Well-Known Member
I’m really not trying to go after that woman. I don’t know her, or the facts.

But wouldn’t the physics of getting a penis inside her make it kind of obvious whether or not that happened?

If it were me, I feel like that would be a detail that would have been hard to forget.
Not a forgotten detail, she just couldn't swear to it under oath. Something about having her eyes closed and not knowing what was in her.
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
I’m really not trying to go after that woman. I don’t know her, or the facts.

But wouldn’t the physics of getting a penis inside her make it kind of obvious whether or not that happened?

If it were me, I feel like that would be a detail that would have been hard to forget.
She says a camp counselor raped her when she was young. And a dentist. And an unnamed employer. And Harvey Weinstein. And Donald Trump. She just happens to get raped all over the place lol. Give me a break.

She couldn't even remember what year it supposedly happened lol.

What a joke.
 

newolddude

Well-Known Member
Damn, Rupert.

Fvu1uqMXwAACEri
 

MrFedEx

Engorged Member
The RINO's are stampeding.
Ever see E. Jean Carroll when she was younger? Absolute stunner. Looked great then, but all of you see the 79 year-old version. It's pretty remarkable that all of his accusers have almost verbatim stories, and then there's that pesky Access Hollywood tape. Ever the Ego King, Trump pretty much confirmed that the tape was an accurate portrayal of his attitude towards women in his deposition. Oh, yeah, and E.Jean was hot enough that he actually mistook a picture of her for ex-wife Marla Maples, who has been remarkably silent since visting Trump Tower a few days after the 2016 victory.
Yet all of the usual suspects here won't acknowledge the obvious, nor any of the facts surrounding this (and other) molestaion cases involving DJT.
Perhaps Mike Lindell has to come on here to convince all of you. Actually, you already know, yet your terminal TDS prevents you from saying anything negative about Orange Jesus.
Astounding.
 
Top