Trump to meet with Kim Yong Un

[It will be fine]

It's a leftie news source.

View attachment 184579

I'm sure a decision like being the first US president to meet with North Korea was well detailed in an official White House statement after careful consideration with the State department. We can just reference that document for details...Oh, right.

 

[Catatonic]

I'm sure a decision like being the first US president to meet with North Korea was well detailed in an official White House statement after careful consideration with the State department. We can just reference that document for details...Oh, right.

OK

 

[Catatonic]

Trump's bold stroke on North Korea dissolves into confusion

Politico ... SMH

The title is BS but the article itself was OK.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

It's a leftie news source.

So?

 

[Catatonic]

So?

Don't trust without verification.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Don't trust without verification.

Ok.
But you didn't comment on it at all you just ranted "fake news" into the abyss. Total move.

 

[Catatonic]

Ok.
But you didn't comment on it at all you just ranted "fake news" into the abyss. Total move.

SO!
It was a link ... I'm interested in what other BCer's think.
If I want to read links I'll read @rickyb's posts.
That's just me.

BTW, if you want some of my wife's ass, I'm OK with that.

 

[bbsam]

It's a leftie news source.

View attachment 184579

So you new source says the meeting will take place when?

Yeah. That’s what I thought.

 

[Catatonic]

So you new source says the meeting will take place when?

Yeah. That’s what I thought.

View attachment 184579

 

[bbsam]

Politico ... SMH

Politico - Wikipedia

 

[BrownArmy]

Politico ... SMH

Have you not defended them before?

 

[Catatonic]

Politico - Wikipedia

Damn!
They are worse than I thought they were.

 

[cosmo1]

Uummmm.......

White House: Never Mind the North Korea Meeting, Trump Was Just Babbling

 

[Catatonic]

Have you not defended Politico before?

Nope ... never.
I've defended PolitiFact's Fact-Check (not associated with Politico) several times
It is definitely left-leaning and chooses to fact check Repugs over twice as often as Dims.
However, I have found their stuff to be fairly accurate although definitely easier on Dims in their verbiage.

So Left-leaning but decent factual info.
I use the Fact Check pages often.
The rest of their site is slanted coverage to the left.

 

[newfie]

China doesn't want a unified Korea. The South would be integrating the North and that would put a US ally on their border.

tired argument with excess assumptions. the real danger is a unified korea that leans the other way. A unified Korea would instantly become one of the most powerful countries in the world. There is much to worry about here.

 

[newfie]

Typical , attack the source.

typical trying to call others cuckservatives.

 

[newfie]

I'm sure a decision like being the first US president to meet with North Korea was well detailed in an official White House statement after careful consideration with the State department. We can just reference that document for details...Oh, right.

Trump said he would be willing to meet with UN months ago . This decision was made before this week. I do enjoy how you folks keep underestimating Trump and his team part of which includes the equally brilliant Kelly and Mathis.

 

[newfie]

So?

its like fox news with ugly liberal women reporting the news. hope that helps

 

[BrownArmy]

Nope ... never.
I've defended PolitiFact's Fact-Check (not associated with Politico) several times
It is definitely left-leaning and chooses to fact check Repugs over twice as often as Dims.
However, I have found their stuff to be fairly accurate although definitely easier on Dims in their verbiage.

So Left-leaning but decent factual info.
I use the Fact Check pages often.
The rest of their site is slanted coverage to the left.

My mistake.

 

[Catatonic]

My mistake.