U.S. Court of Appeals Upholds President Bushs Union Dues Executive Order



U.S. Court of Appeals Upholds President Bushs Union Dues Executive Order
Employees gain measure of protection from union electioneering with forced union dues
April 23, 2003
Washington, D.C. (April 22, 2003) The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia today upheld President George W. Bushs Executive Order requiring federal contractors to post notices informing employees that they cannot be compelled to join a union or pay union dues spent for partisan politics or other activities unrelated to collective bargaining.

The 2-1 decision overturns a previous ruling from the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia that invalidated the Presidents Executive Order. In addition to defending the order as amicus curiae in the case, the National Right to Work Foundation had called upon the Bush administration to appeal the District Courts original decision and delivered over 100,000 signed grassroots petitions urging President Bush to defend his Executive Order from union attack.

This ruling is a step toward informing employees they have the right not to be shaken down to pay for union political activities, stated Stefan Gleason, Vice President of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. No employee should be forced to fund a political agenda they abhor as a job condition.

Signed on February 17, 2001, Executive Order 13201 would affect a segment of the 12 million American employees compelled to pay union dues as a condition of employment, as it requires companies with federal contracts to inform workers of their rights under the Foundation-won Supreme Court decision in Communications Workers v. Beck. Bushs father issued a similar Executive Order in April of 1992 that was immediately revoked at the request of union officials when President Clinton took office in 1993.

Additionally, the Clinton National Labor Relations Board stonewalled the enforcement of these precious employee protections, often leaving many cases languishing within the bureaucracy for six or more years. To this day, the NLRB has failed to enforce the Beck decision aggressively.

In January 2002, Judge Henry H. Kennedy of the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia enjoined the implementation of the Presidents directive on the grounds that the action was preempted by Congress despite the fact that Bushs Executive Order only seeks to enforce the Supreme Courts interpretation of congressionally enacted law. In May 2001, a group of unions filed the case, known as UAW-Labor Employment and Training Corporation et al. v. Chao et al.

Hopefully, this will send a message to the NLRB to start enforcing Beck, instead of continuing to be a bureaucratic sinkhole. Beck also serves as a check against union corruption.

(Message edited by my2cents on April 26, 2003)