We have a situation at our gateway that I am inquiring about that I heard of today.
The company has told a part time employee that he is not able to use FMLA because he has not been employed for 3 years. To my knowledge, and this is why I'm asking, being employed 3 years is not a requirement. I had an FLMA problem with UPS many years ago, and when I researched it then it was 1250 hours in the last 12 months of employment, and you had to be employed for 12 months.
Can anyone shed some light on the subject?
Thank you!
The company has told a part time employee that he is not able to use FMLA because he has not been employed for 3 years. To my knowledge, and this is why I'm asking, being employed 3 years is not a requirement. I had an FLMA problem with UPS many years ago, and when I researched it then it was 1250 hours in the last 12 months of employment, and you had to be employed for 12 months.
Can anyone shed some light on the subject?
Thank you!