US Economy

Brownslave688

You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
ITs called the GENERAL WELFARE CLAUSE... try reading the constitution next time bro.

TOS.
General welfare I would think would be for the country as a whole. Not an individual.

Cover things such as infrastructure. Not cover an individual with 6 kids by 5 different people or someone who refuses to work.
 

Catatonic

Nine Lives
... but there is nothing in the Constitution that even hints at the various social programs that the US National government mandates or funds.
ITs called the GENERAL WELFARE CLAUSE... try reading the constitution next time bro.

TOS.
OK ... my mistake for saying hints.
Extremely slight hint ... I'll give you that ... maybe ... but only on a technicality.
The people who wrote the Constitution did not have any of these Socialist programs in mind.

I, obviously, was speaking of the intent when the Constitution was written while you are speaking of modern laws loosely based on some justification within the Constitution.
These Social ideas and certainly the Social programs did not develop until more than 50 years after the Constitution was written.

The General Welfare Clause has been used to extend beyond the original intent of the writers of the Constitution but that's a forward looking preamble as it allows the laws to expand beyond what was immediately known at the time of the writing of the Constitution.
According to James Madison, the clause authorized Congress to spend money, but only to carry out the powers and duties specifically enumerated in the subsequent clauses of Article I, Section 8, and elsewhere in the Constitution, not to meet the seemingly infinite needs of the general welfare.
Alexander Hamilton
maintained that the clause granted Congress the power to spend without limitation for the general welfare of the nation. However, it was 150 years (1936) before the Supreme Court allowed for the expansion of the original intent of this clause as written by James Madison.

This brings to mind projects I have been involved in over the years, where I always insisted on inclusion in the Project Definition document what was not included in the project. This saved much wasted time, effort and money over the years.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
ioooqx.jpg
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
Tell that to the likes of Pelosi and Reid. They want to "help" everybody.

Arent you the person writing in another thread, to stop a major construction project that would employ THOUSANDS of californians?? You complain about the unemployed, yet support every GOP effort to kill job growth in this country.

Do you even realize you argue both sides of this argument?

Good thing the younger generation will control our future. The old white people just dont have a clue how to move this country along.

TOS.
 

island1fox

Well-Known Member
Arent you the person writing in another thread, to stop a major construction project that would employ THOUSANDS of californians?? You complain about the unemployed, yet support every GOP effort to kill job growth in this country.

Do you even realize you argue both sides of this argument?

Good thing the younger generation will control our future. The old white people just dont have a clue how to move this country along.

TOS.
tos,


You --seem to be guilty of : Age discrimination and Racial Bias. Shocking for a Liberal -- they would never do such things.

Replace the former hater with the new hater ---now that is Progress !!:ban:
 
Top