teamsterdan
Well-Known Member
this is an acronym pertaining to the re-employment of employees after they return from military service (http://www.dol.gov/elaws/userra.htm)
I have some experience helping out a co-worker go from a p/t job he had prior to military service, & get him into a full-time driving job that had been posted/bid during his absence (he was USMC reserve) and was gone for boot camp......long story short he ended up injuring his back and left ups(not sure of details)......So now a guy I work w/ just finished his active duty obligation in the USMC, so he was gone for 4yrs.; according to "the act"
"A person whose military service lasted 91 days or more, must be promptly reemployed in the following order of priority:
In the job the person would have held had the person remained continuously employed or a position of equivalent seniority, status, and pay so long as the person is qualified for the job, or can become qualified after reasonable efforts by the employer to qualify the person;"
the facts now are that there are @ least 5 friend/t jobs obtained by people w/ less seniority than him.......question is does he have the "right" to one of the friend/t jobs or not (THEY DO)........mgt. told them "they don't know abt that" .......or my interpretation of mgt's response which is "we loved you as a marine but friend/u as a teamster" anyone else w/ info to share or know of other vets that may be dealing w/ this kind of BS please have them get in touch w/ me.........ALLONS
I have some experience helping out a co-worker go from a p/t job he had prior to military service, & get him into a full-time driving job that had been posted/bid during his absence (he was USMC reserve) and was gone for boot camp......long story short he ended up injuring his back and left ups(not sure of details)......So now a guy I work w/ just finished his active duty obligation in the USMC, so he was gone for 4yrs.; according to "the act"
"A person whose military service lasted 91 days or more, must be promptly reemployed in the following order of priority:
In the job the person would have held had the person remained continuously employed or a position of equivalent seniority, status, and pay so long as the person is qualified for the job, or can become qualified after reasonable efforts by the employer to qualify the person;"
the facts now are that there are @ least 5 friend/t jobs obtained by people w/ less seniority than him.......question is does he have the "right" to one of the friend/t jobs or not (THEY DO)........mgt. told them "they don't know abt that" .......or my interpretation of mgt's response which is "we loved you as a marine but friend/u as a teamster" anyone else w/ info to share or know of other vets that may be dealing w/ this kind of BS please have them get in touch w/ me.........ALLONS