Jumpin Jack Flash
Troll
Conservative Judge John Roberts and Trump appointed Justice Kavanaugh have decided the ACA will stand! It’s not unConstitutional! MAGA
So all the outcry from the hysterical leftwinnies wasn’t sincere or justified?Conservative Judge John Roberts and Trump appointed Justice Kavanaugh have decided the ACA will stand! It’s not unConstitutional! MAGA
So all the outcry from the hysterical leftwinnies wasn’t sincere or justified?
No smilet!
Nobody but a total friend*king idiot believed the SCOTUS would overturn a law that helps individuals.
It was passed as not a tax which made it unconstitutional. It was only through some rewriting of the law by Roberts that allowed it to stand.what was missing is integrity and transparency on the SCOTUS answer .
they used the individual mandate being a legitimate tax as a reason to uphold it.
they should have given us your answer and saved the country some time and expense
You're speaking about things you have absolutely no knowledge of. My advice to you, and anyone that gives you a winner vote (@Old Man Jingles) is to be silent on this matter.Conservative Judge John Roberts and Trump appointed Justice Kavanaugh have decided the ACA will stand! It’s not unConstitutional! MAGA
This case does not have anything to do with ending Obamacare, it deals with severability of the mandate.So all the outcry from the hysterical leftwinnies wasn’t sincere or justified?
No smilet!
Nobody but a total friend*king idiot believed the SCOTUS would overturn a law that helps individuals.
In her confirmation hearings ACB said the issue was severability and she would probably rule in favor of that. If the whole law remained intact it would have to be thrown out.This case does not have anything to do with ending Obamacare, it deals with severability of the mandate.
She did say that, and as far as I am aware That is the only Constitutional issue, it's the only one at bar now,In her confirmation hearings ACB said the issue was severability and she would probably rule in favor of that. If the whole law remained intact it would have to be thrown out.
You're speaking about things you have absolutely no knowledge of. My advice to you, and anyone that gives you a winner vote (@Old Man Jingles) is to be silent on this matter.
Just my opinion, feel free to do what you think you need to.
FYI, Roberts has proven he has no regard for the Constitution, I've previously noted here I believe Kavanaugh will prove himself likewise.
Would they open themselves to lawsuits by breaking the law?She did say that, and as far as I am aware That is the only Constitutional issue, it's the only one at bar now,
The next thing that needs to happen, in my mind, is an insurance company to begin issuing policies that do not conform to the requirements of the ACA, that would be the next challenge.
My opinion, which is never humble.
And most don't seem to understand that.This case does not have anything to do with ending Obamacare, it deals with severability of the mandate.
The next thin that needs to happen is that the House and Senate need to pass a statute that overturns Obamacare.She did say that, and as far as I am aware That is the only Constitutional issue, it's the only one at bar now,
The next thing that needs to happen, ...
That didn't stop Roberts before.The next thin that needs to happen is that the House and Senate need to pass a statute that overturns Obamacare.
That is not the SCOTUS's responsibility ... that would be legislating from the bench.
You couldn’t be more wrong. The US Supreme Court hinted that it may uphold Obamacare despite the Trump administration's latest effort to strike it downThis case does not have anything to do with ending Obamacare, it deals with severability of the mandate.
I'm sure Pelosi is eager to....The next thin that needs to happen is that the House and Senate need to pass a statute that overturns Obamacare.
That is not the SCOTUS's responsibility ... that would be legislating from the bench.