upsers22.3
Well-Known Member
Is It about dividing and conquering Each local one at a time.
What??Because. Why not?
Is It about dividing and conquering Each local one at a time.
Not reallyBecause Cali has different issues that Louisville which are different in Florida.
Yes really. Louisville has an air hub that has different needs than the rest of the countryNot really
Is It about dividing and conquering Each local one at a time.
Different jobs yes. But a preloader in Colorado same as a preloader in Alabama. A driver in California the same as a driver in Michigan.Yes really. Louisville has an air hub that has different needs than the rest of the country
There were Supplements, Riders or Addendum all over the country prior to a National Master Agreement existing. When a national contract was negotiated those areas wanted to keep what they had in those areas. Also as I said there are different needs in different areas. Florida has golf carts to deliver packages.Different jobs yes. But a preloader in Colorado same as a preloader in Alabama. A driver in California the same as a driver in Michigan.
Do golf carts get handrails?There were Supplements, Riders or Addendum all over the country prior to a National Master Agreement existing. When a national contract was negotiated those areas wanted to keep what they had in those areas. Also as I said there are different needs in different areas. Florida has golf carts to deliver packages.
Different jobs yes. But a preloader in Colorado same as a preloader in Alabama. A driver in California the same as a driver in Michigan.
How would you improve your supplements
I'm not sure TDU is in the position to dictate anything, to anybody, where the IBT most certainly is and is attempting to do so daily.Not let TDU... try and dictate to everyone what a specific Region needs ??
-Bug-
Still on the conspiracy theory. Could you point out viable reasons how the H&W is unsustainable other than the Hoffa letter that both of us know was directed at smaller, less well funded plans? You do realize funding for H&W is apples and oranges from Pensions right? Money in from contributions, money out for claims, a little left for reserve and no long term liability as participants come and go. As is without UPS contributions the CS H&W plan is doing fine and needed no "bolstering". By adding in UPS contributions AND low claim experience part timers, sustainability becomes the least of their worries.Had the IBT been looking out for UPSers in the latest UPS contract, instead of trying to bolster an unsustainable multi-employer Central States H&W fund, they would have had ample leverage to negotiate an amicable contract for UPSers.
So instead of blaming the Boogie Man for all our problems, perhaps we should look within.
Still on the conspiracy theory. Could you point out viable reasons how the H&W is unsustainable other than the Hoffa letter that both of us know was directed at smaller, less well funded plans? You do realize funding for H&W is apples and oranges from Pensions right? Money in from contributions, money out for claims, a little left for reserve and no long term liability as participants come and go. As is without UPS contributions the CS H&W plan is doing fine and needed no "bolstering". By adding in UPS contributions AND low claim experience part timers, sustainability becomes the least of their worries.
Care to expound on how the IBT "would have had ample leverage to negotiate an amicable contract for UPSers"? Maybe leaving the UPS offer of $30, $60, $90 co-premiums on the table? Still wondering where all the ample leverage was.
Must be incompetent, inexperienced buffoons at the helm. If only we had someone who knows how to deal with UPS negotiating contracts, maybe someone who led a national strike... where oh where would we find that person?