Will the leftists demand someone be jailed?

[av8torntn]

http://m.washingtonpost.com/world/n...8e80cc-e444-11e3-8f90-73e071f3d637_story.html


Will the Senate support a special counsel?

 

[moreluck]

Oopsie !!

 

[wkmac]

Obama promised transparency so what little tidbits of it we get, far be it from me to come down on him for it.

 

[roadrunner2012]

Did you read your article?

"Their names were included on a list of participants in the briefing provided by U.S. military officials to the White House press office."

 

[moreluck]

Did you read your article?

"Their names were included on a list of participants in the briefing provided by U.S. military officials to the White House press office."

So, who's the boss of the military (commander in chief)?????

 

[oldngray]

The reporter who distributes the pool report sends it to the White House to be checked for factual accuracy and then forwarded to the thousands of journalists on the email distribution list, so in this case the White House failed on at least two occasions to recognize that the CIA official's name was being revealed and circulated so broadly.

http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-mistakenly-reveals-cia-officials-name-151930472--politics.html

 

[av8torntn]

Did you read your article?

"Their names were included on a list of participants in the briefing provided by U.S. military officials to the White House press office."

Was that addressed at me? If it was the article should be self explanatory. All leftists that wanted someone from the Bush administration to be prosecuted for something far less serious will I hope be consistent and demand prosecution in this case. I, of course, realize that you will not as by nature a dimocrat only demands others to be held to standards.

 

[av8torntn]

White House staff in full "blame others mode".

 

[The Other Side]

Again, another NON story.

mistakes happen. remember 911?

TOS.

 

[av8torntn]

Again, another NON story.

mistakes happen. remember 911?

TOS.

I knew you would demand prosecution.

 

[The Other Side]

I knew you would demand prosecution.

Why is it, that you can take two completely different scenarios, and try to make an issue out of them?

In BUSH's case, scooter libby outed Valerie Plame for political reasons and he went to jail for it.

In this case, it was an accident from a low level press relations officer who recieved the information from the military.

How you connect the two is beyond imagination.

It goes to show how YOU and the morelucks of the world can be controlled by the "narratives" placed in front of you.

You clearly have no independent thoughts of your own.

Maybe you should just have another beer and call it a day.

TOS.

 

[BrownArmy]

Apples and oranges.

 

[av8torntn]

Apples and oranges.

I agree they actually outed a CIA agent this time.

Well that and a dimocrat is in charge.

 

[av8torntn]

In BUSH's case, scooter libby outed Valerie Plame for political reasons and he went to jail for it.



TOS.

Since that's false some may see the point.

 

[Babagounj]

In BUSH's case, scooter libby outed Valerie Plame for political reasons and he went to jail for it.
TOS.

Richard Armitage is confirmed to be the first and primary source of the CIA leak investigation .
Libby was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice for lying about the disclosure to investigators, but was not criminally charged for releasing Plame's identity.

 

[MrFedEx]

http://m.washingtonpost.com/world/n...8e80cc-e444-11e3-8f90-73e071f3d637_story.html


Will the Senate support a special counsel?

There's a big difference here, one which you missed entirely. This was an accidental leak of information as opposed to an intentional outing/political vendetta. Do you see the difference? My guess is that you don't.

 

[av8torntn]

There's a big difference here, one which you missed entirely. This was an accidental leak of information as opposed to an intentional outing/political vendetta. Do you see the difference? My guess is that you don't.

That's not true either which just enforces my point. Not that I needed it.

 

[av8torntn]

When Bushies blew a CIA cover, it was 'treason'; now, it's a mistake | Mobile Washington Examiner
http://washingtonexaminer.com/when-...was-treason-now-its-a-mistake/article/2549026

 

[MrFedEx]

When Bushies blew a CIA cover, it was 'treason'; now, it's a mistake | Mobile Washington Examiner
http://washingtonexaminer.com/when-...was-treason-now-its-a-mistake/article/2549026

Intentional vs. accidental. What don't you understand?

 

[av8torntn]

Intentional vs. accidental. What don't you understand?

No surprise you don't understand.