22.4s... miss them yet?

[I have NOT been lurking]

Ha, probably. Actually never had one. I just like that girls lips.

It's been changed anyway. It's not the Crunk juice anymore

 

[Coldworld]

It's been changed anyway. It's not the Crunk juice anymore

Why they always have to ruin a good thing???

 

[Coldworld]

The natives around here effing LOOOOVVE that .

Liquid crack?

 

[I have NOT been lurking]

Why they always have to ruin a good thing???

Politicians

 

[eats packages]

Saturdays may be easier in general but my brain hurts from all the complete stupidity and lack of direction or planning that occurs in excess of a normal workday.

 

[Brownslave688]

Don’t you mean start?

Why when you can buy bitcoin

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

Why when you can buy bitcoin

That sucks something you do young in your career until you have everything such as emergency fund, 401k and have your bills paid off

 

[I have NOT been lurking]

View attachment 447746

She must be an expert on

 

[Over70irregs]

Saturdays may be easier in general but my brain hurts from all the complete stupidity and lack of direction or planning that occurs in excess of a normal workday.

It’s like having 3rd shift managers

 

[PreTrippin’]

Liquid crack?

Fire water.

 

[Coldworld]

Fire water.

Perhaps

 

[Coldworld]

She must be an expert on

She has tongue action

 

[Coldworld]

That sucks something you do young in your career until you have everything such as emergency fund, 401k and have your bills paid off

Thanks dad

 

[Up In Smoke]

I will be presenting the first 9.5 grievances for the newly reclassified RPCDs tomorrow at a local level. The company's position is that the drivers have not fully met the criteria that allows for penalty pay. Our position is that from 2015-2018 we settled nearly a hundred exact grievances for T-S employees prior to the existence of the 22.4 classification. Most certainly headed to a State Panel hearing and possibly beyond.

 

[Thebrownblob]

I will be presenting the first 9.5 grievances for the newly reclassified RPCDs tomorrow at a local level. The company's position is that the drivers have not fully met the criteria that allows for penalty pay. Our position is that from 2015-2018 we settled nearly a hundred exact grievances for T-S employees prior to the existence of the 22.4 classification. Most certainly headed to a State Panel hearing and possibly beyond.

That’s the same position The company is taking here. Unfortunately we have not had anyone violate just yet. Good luck.

 

[542thruNthru]

I will be presenting the first 9.5 grievances for the newly reclassified RPCDs tomorrow at a local level. The company's position is that the drivers have not fully met the criteria that allows for penalty pay. Our position is that from 2015-2018 we settled nearly a hundred exact grievances for T-S employees prior to the existence of the 22.4 classification. Most certainly headed to a State Panel hearing and possibly beyond.

Sorry I'm confused. Are you saying that the company's position is T-S drivers can't file 9.5?

 

[Up In Smoke]

Sorry I'm confused. Are you saying that the company's position is T-S drivers can't file 9.5?

Yes, the 5 days on one area bs.

 

[BigUnionGuy]

Yes, the 5 days on one area bs.

That's what the language says....


"Employees within the full-time driver classification shall be eligible for the protection of this Section provided: (1) the employee covers a route for a full week; (2) the employee bids or is assigned to cover a route for a full week but is prevented from completing that bid or assignment due to reassignment by the Employer; or (3) an employee with four (4) years of seniority as a full-time package driver."

 

[deeztier]

Yes, the 5 days on one area bs.

weird, i would have thought this would protect that:

(2) the employee bids or is assigned to cover a route for a full week but is prevented from
completing that bid or assignment due to reassignment by the Employer

 

[Up In Smoke]

That's what the language says....


"Employees within the full-time driver classification shall be eligible for the protection of this Section provided: (1) the employee covers a route for a full week; (2) the employee bids or is assigned to cover a route for a full week but is prevented from completing that bid or assignment due to reassignment by the Employer; or (3) an employee with four (4) years of seniority as a full-time package driver."

The Saturday plan changes the route ID, not the delivery area in some cases. We have some past practice that is relevant, in our opinion.