FedEx doesn't advertise it's mistakes...even internally. I've been around a long time and never heard of a "re-survey" until just recently.
Oh well if MFE hasn't heard of it, it must only be available to those who know the secret handshake.
If the SFA is such a great indicator, why re-test at all?
Good answer but not what we were looking for, sorry you lose. It's
because the SFA is a good indicator that you would want to re-survey when a score is bad. That way you can see if you've made any progress. Tough concept, I know, so let it rattle around for a while and see if it sinks in.
Read my posts. many of which are extremely critical of the union, quite unlike your kiss-up tales that nearly always spin the "facts" in the favor of FedEx...kind of like FOX News.
I'm not spinning anything. I'm just presenting facts to show how you are spinning things. You consistently twist people's words and conveniently leave out important details.
And, of course, the people re-taking the SFA know it...duh. What they don't know is the corporate methodology or rationale for the re-test.
Well duh! Of course they know what the rationale is. Most if not all of them took the SFA 6 months earlier and know that their manager had a low score. Maybe you can't figure out why they would be re-surveying but fortunately they're smart enough to figure it out.
Go ahead and try to discredit me.
Already done.
If it's your job, you suck at it, because I've consistently exposed your one-sided rants that almost always support FedEx.
Oh you mean how re-surveys are secret and absences you know nothing about should be covered under FMLA. All you've exposed is how little you really know and how you are most likely just a union plant.
If Fred told you that putting heroin on your Cheerios was good for you...you'd do it, AND try to sell the rest of us on how FedEx has our best interests at heart. Get a bigger straw, and tell Maury he needs to hire better talent.
And in conclusion, you again try to discredit me by presuming to know what I think and you do a very poor job at it. Unlike you, I can think for myself and I encourage people to do the same. As I said, they shouldn't take my word or yours and thankfully you've exposed yourself for what you are and now maybe people will research for themselves and won't be swayed by your misdirection. Might be time to get a new script from your local.