Election is over.

By The Book

Well-Known Member
As of yesterday, December 19th, now the actual election is officially over. Under the category of "be careful what you ask for":

".....despite a pitched effort by some on the left who wrote letters to Trump electors trying to persuade them to switch their votes or not vote at all.........more electors tried to defect from Hillary Clinton Monday than from Trump, by a count of eight to two."

Donald Trump Secures Electoral College Win, With Few Surprises
So Donald Trump officially ended up with more electoral votes than he had before? That backfired on the democrats
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
Before vote it was 306 vs 232 .
After vote is was 304 vs 227.

The DNC choice for VP also lost votes ; some one picked Sen. Lying Warren .
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
Fun Facts ;

  • Clinton won California by 4.2 million votes and New York by 1.6 million, running up the score in places where she would have won no matter what
  • Outside of those two liberal states, Trump was 3 million votes ahead
  • California alone accounted for more than Clinton's national popular-vote edge
  • Newt Gingrich mocked: 'This is football season. A team can have more yards and lose the game. What matters is how many points you put on the board'

Final tally shows Trump lost popular vote by 2.8 million | Daily Mail Online
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
If they only went by the popular vote, California and New York would always pick the president and as far as California goes, it would be the Democrat. The electoral college is more fair & balanced.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
68d69f677dd61dfa2e2fcec5b1a090cc.jpg
 

MrFedEx

Engorged Member
Before vote it was 306 vs 232 .
After vote is was 304 vs 227.

The DNC choice for VP also lost votes ; some one picked Sen. Lying Warren .

We all lose with Trump. It will just take you longer to figure it out. Today, the maroon-Elect upped the ante on the nuclear arms race, and is thinking about replacing the friend-35 with a 20+ year-old basic aircraft design (FA-18).

Democrats know he's a fake and a fool. It will just take you longer to realize it.

Carry-on, tool for the fool.
 
P

pickup

Guest
We all lose with Trump. It will just take you longer to figure it out. Today, the maroon-Elect upped the ante on the nuclear arms race, and is thinking about replacing the friend-35 with a 20+ year-old basic aircraft design (FA-18).

Democrats know he's a fake and a fool. It will just take you longer to realize it.

Carry-on, tool for the fool.

Everything Baba Gounj posted in the post you angrily responded to were hard facts. Maybe you should join TOS in his safe space, SNOWFLAKE !
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
We all lose with Trump. It will just take you longer to figure it out. Today, the maroon-Elect upped the ante on the nuclear arms race, and is thinking about replacing the friend-35 with a 20+ year-old basic aircraft design (FA-18).

Democrats know he's a fake and a fool. It will just take you longer to realize it.

Carry-on, tool for the fool.
I think its called economics .
Would you spend a lot of money for a few planes or a lot of money for many planes .
Maybe the USAF should mothball its fleet of C-130s since that plane has been flying since Aug. 1954 .
Or the B-52 flying since April 1952.
It did just retire the last friend-4 Phantom II which has been flying since May 1958.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
I think its called economics .
Would you spend a lot of money for a few planes or a lot of money for many planes .
Maybe the USAF should mothball its fleet of C-130s since that plane has been flying since Aug. 1954 .
Or the B-52 flying since April 1952.
It did just retire the last friend-4 Phantom II which has been flying since May 1958.
An friend-18 is not and will never be comparable to the friend-35, it's an idiotic statement. Trump's tweet that he asked Boeing to price an friend-18 built to be comparable to the friend-35 just shows his complete ignorance of the situation. I'm sure a lot of people at Boeing got a good laugh out of it.
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
The friend-35 is not designed to take on missions that the friend-18 can do.
The friend-35 is strictly a flying missile carrier , while the friend-18 is designed to dog fight.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
The friend-35 is not designed to take on missions that the friend-18 can do.
The friend-35 is strictly a flying missile carrier , while the friend-18 is designed to dog fight.
So you agree with me then? Trump asked Boeing to make plans for an friend-18 capable of the things an friend-35 is, which is not possible. He displayed his ignorance on the topic.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
We all lose with Trump. It will just take you longer to figure it out. Today, the maroon-Elect upped the ante on the nuclear arms race, and is thinking about replacing the friend-35 with a 20+ year-old basic aircraft design (FA-18).

Democrats know he's a fake and a fool. It will just take you longer to realize it.

Carry-on, tool for the fool.

trump won again. Election is over again.
 
Top