Yes with all the binding contractual obligations Union representation can provide and good things that can come your way. Politicians and CEO's can always muster the power to break the back of unions. And always have. Since 9/11 the economy as it pertains to FedEx has changed drastically. Shrinking the overall size of express has been the goal since then. Cut everyone to the bone, figure out how to still employ people and turn a profit.
Under the capitalist flag which IS America, and unfortunately for the worlds indigenous socialists, the biggest corporations in the world are aligned with and basically own the worlds largest companies. But Migrant Worker!!!! "Without unions all workers would be back in the dark ages. We gave you Monday-Friday work weeks, 40 hours, paid vacation, holiday, maternity leave, etc." But since then: unions reward laziness. Promotions usually don't lead to the most qualified person getting the job, they have to promote the person who has the most seniority. They pocket your money and tell you it's for your own good. If the American way is capitalism, then why would companies align themselves with union organization? Why would companies allow these organizations to fatten there members pockets at the expense of the rest of society? As well as float the overhead costs of union representation, all of the union leadership making ridiculously high salaries. Lastly, If you think I totally off my rocker. Remember when President Obama promised to deliver a Union to Express back in 2008?