Sure, show me evidence for your conspiracy theory that Trump believed he lost and was trying to commit election fraud to cheat.
That’s what the pending legal case will determine.
And yet you started this conversation by claiming fraud has already been proven because a guy who looked at election results without permission plead to a misdemeanor.
He fraudulently accessed and copied election ballots and/or data.
Imagine a Democrat elections worker engaging in this behavior and then imagine your reaction.
Nope. If he was guilty of fraud they would have prosecuted him for it. Sorry kiddo, words have meaning, and the facts don't care about your conspiracy theories.
What behavior? Trying to look at election results? Can you even hear yourself lol.
He’s low level. They turned him. That’s the way this works, kiddo.
Unauthorized access and duplication of elections data. You guys would
a damn brick.
Not prosecuting someone for election fraud proves election fraud.
Why? Lol. Make triplicates of the data, we don't cheat so we don't care.Unauthorized access and duplication of elections data. You guys would
That’s what they’re going to try to prove in a court of law, son.
Uh huh…
Mkay well they just tried and failed, let the guy off with misdemeanors.
They’re building their case against bigger fish.
You're not dumb enough to think they would let him off if he was guilty of fraud.
Yes, they definitely could and would. Because he’s not their primary target. Does that help you?
Very stupid take.
Why exactly is it stupid? This is clearly the prosecution’s strategy.
