I'm just taking it to another level. You can't expect anything else from me. I'm just that good.You can't have two.
I'm going to have to report this post.
I'm just taking it to another level. You can't expect anything else from me. I'm just that good.You can't have two.
I'm going to have to report this post.
Please don't report me. These moderators have a hard enough time with some of these members here!!!!!You can't have two.
I'm going to have to report this post.
Will you be saying that when they have to make changes due to lack of funds to maintain benefitsAll your representatives had to do was agree with local 177 and the west coast guys and you would have even better... I don't know about you but if I can get something better that is effortless to get (when I mean effortless, just jump on board)... You would have to be crazy to say no to that.
That sounds like lunacy. A full timer not able to bump? Full timers laid off? Crazy!They have an agreement practice that sucks. One can only wonder why they would have agreed to it. As far as I know there are no other locals with this kinda agreement so it's a moot point.
Not to be Debbie downer but with so few participants it will most assuredly be just a matter of time.Will you be saying that when they have to make changes due to lack of funds to maintain benefits
It's simple economics.Will you be saying that when they have to make changes due to lack of funds to maintain benefits
Ask FredIt's simple economics.
How can a better plan be purchased with less participants?
Why was it allowed in the first place?
My questions weren't rhetorical?Ask Fred
With all this knowledge why are you driving a truck?
Why aren't you electable?
It's simple.
It's simple economics.
How can a better plan be purchased with less participants?
Why was it allowed in the first place?
From what I know it's a different world.That sounds like lunacy. A full timer not able to bump? Full timers laid off? Crazy!
How can anyone answer when we don't know what the plan really covers or how it really stacks up?My questions weren't rhetorical?
I know how Fred would answer, what's your take?
My questions weren't rhetorical?
I know how Fred would answer, what's your take?
My questions aren't rhetorical either.My questions weren't rhetorical?
I know how Fred would answer, what's your take?
Are you saying the West "carve out" has a secret summary plan description?How can anyone answer when we don't know what the plan really covers or how it really stacks up?
The question is can it continueAre you saying the West "carve out" has a secret summary plan description?
All I'm asking, if anybody can get past TU or TDU rhetoric, is how can a plan with far less participants, achieve superior or parallel benefits, and why was it permitted?
I am not claiming to know these answers.
Then wouldn't it make sense for all UPS Teamsters to be in TeamCare, in order to get the most value for all dollars contributed by UPS for their employees?The question is can it continue
I don't have their SPD
Voted for when, by what members?It was allowed because it was voted for by the members.
I figured that when we had the exact same maintenance of standards verbiage.It had zero to do with maintenance of standards language someone referenced in another thread.
Does UPS put in more for carve outs?Are you saying the West "carve out" has a secret summary plan description?
All I'm asking, if anybody can get past TU or TDU rhetoric, is how can a plan with far less participants, achieve superior or parallel benefits, and why was it permitted?
I am not claiming to know these answers, but am admittedly skeptical.
The answer is sometimes you can't save people from themselves.Then wouldn't it make sense for all UPS Teamsters to be in TeamCare, in order to get the most value for all dollars contributed by UPS for their employees?
Voted for when, by what members?
We were told in the Central Region that when the National Master passed, but the Central Region Supplement failed, that the health care issue was off the table?
I figured that when we had the exact same maintenance of standards verbiage.
CrypticThe answer is sometimes you can't save people from themselves.
Demographics, expected utilization, and size. Remember the Western Region, with the L177 addition, is not an insubstantial group.All I'm asking, if anybody can get past TU or TDU rhetoric, is how can a plan with far less participants, achieve superior or parallel benefits
Probably but insurance discounts are negotiated by regional providers.Then wouldn't it make sense for all UPS Teamsters to be in TeamCare, in order to get the most value for all dollars contributed by UPS for their employees?
I wouldn't think so?Does UPS put in more for carve outs?
And that's why we will probably all end up in TeamCare at some point.Then wouldn't it make sense for all UPS Teamsters to be in TeamCare, in order to get the most value for all dollars contributed by UPS for their employees?