Will There Be Violence on November 9th?

newfie

Well-Known Member
A little racist hit there, eh? When Trump basically said he wasn't necessarily going to accept the results of the election, there were no qualifiers included. His campaign immediately tried to walk it back, but Trump is essentially speaking dog whistle to his supporters that maybe it is time for some sort of revolution.

Completely irresponsible and thoroughly un-American.

its easy to be responsible when you have the race rigged in your favor.

The question no one is answering is whether a crooked Obama administration will relinquish the power when Donald wins.

Michele and Obama seem to working way to hard to get Hillary whom they despise elected. Is there something Obama is also hiding?
 
Last edited:

Babagounj

Strength through joy
A little racist hit there, eh? When Trump basically said he wasn't necessarily going to accept the results of the election, there were no qualifiers included. His campaign immediately tried to walk it back, but Trump is essentially speaking dog whistle to his supporters that maybe it is time for some sort of revolution.

Completely irresponsible and thoroughly un-American.
I disagree.
This country was founded by native born ( except one ) revolutionists.
Your statement of it being un-American is totally incorrect.
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
its easy to be responsible when you have the race rigged in your favor.

The question no one is answering is whether a crooked Obama administration will relinquish the power when Donald wins.

Michele and Obama seem to working way to hard to get Hillary whom they despise elected. Is there something Obama is also hiding?
Proof: Thousands of GOP votes likely stolen in Pa.
A mathematician by training, Been set out to understand the localized Romney shortfall in Allegheny County. There was an obvious binary nature to the problem: either fewer Republicans voted in 2012 than in 2008 or the official Allegheny County Voter History failed to record all the votes of those who did.

Is it within reason to question whether election officials simply chose not to record thousands of Republican votes? If the numbers in Philadelphia are any indication, the answer is yes. A week after the 2012 election, for instance, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported that in 59 inner-city voting divisions, Mitt Romney received no votes.

“These are the kind of numbers that send Republicans into paroxysms of voter-fraud angst,” reported the Inquirer glibly. Well, yes they do. When Barack Obama outscores Romney by a combined 19,605 to zero votes cast in these 59 districts, the stench of fraud is surely in the air. Fidel Castro never did this well. That said, not a single major media outlet followed up on the Philadelphia story.

Romney received 6 percent of the black vote nationwide. If those numbers held in Philadelphia, and there is no reason to believe they would not have, nearly 1,200 of these Philadelphia voters would have voted for Romney.

If only 14 people voted in those districts, the odds would have favored Romney’s receiving at least one vote. If 80 people had voted, Romney would have had a better than 99 percent chance of receiving at least one of those votes. With nearly 20,000 voters, the odds of Romney being completely shut out are beyond any reasonable calculation.
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
I will be very upset and dissappointed if Trump does actually lose

Better start crying now and get it over with bro.

New polls after the last debate show DRUMPF down by -12 points... a double digit DECREASE since the debate.

All the other polls will be out tomorrow, and they too, wont be good for DRUMPF...

Stock up on tissues.

TOS.
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
The REAL irony in this question, is that DRUMPF is running on a platform that includes controlling law and order and he made it a campaign promise to SNUFF out violence in cities quickly, but...

Now that he knows and his campaign knows , that he is going to get BLOWN OUT in this race, he is calling for Civil Disobedience for his supporters....

So which is it?

Is he the candidate of LAW and ORDER, or CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE?

He cant be both, and if he believes that putting down civil disobedience with a heavy hand of the law and military, then I am all for the military and police to shoot any right wing nut dumb enough to walk out onto the streets and starting trouble.

Live by the sword and die by the sword, I say.

TOS.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Now that he knows and his campaign knows , that he is going to get BLOWN OUT in this race, he is calling for Civil Disobedience for his supporters....

So which is it?

Is he the candidate of LAW and ORDER, or CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE?

He cant be both, and if he believes that putting down civil disobedience with a heavy hand of the law and military, then I am all for the military and police to shoot any right wing nut dumb enough to walk out onto the streets and starting trouble.

do we need to revisit the democratics attack on our election process in 2000 when none other then Hillary Clinton claimed GW was selected not elected?

Live by the sword and die by the sword, I say.

TOS.

That's quite a stretch for even you but not unexpected.

Trump has not called for civil Disobedience nor has he said he would not accept the results.

he has reserved the right to decide whether or not he accepts the results until after the election.

none other then one of your liberal idiot candidates Al Gore laid the ground work for that position in 2000 when he chased hanging chads in an effort to steal the election.

Do we need to revisit the attack on our democratic processes in 2000 when
a) Al Gore dragged this country through a painful process attacking our election processes for weeks and discrediting our election processes at the same time.
b) rememeber the vicious misogynistic attacks on Katheryn Harris the florida state DA not only attacking her appearance but trying to portray her as a slut?
c) Hillary claiming GW was selected not elected?

you folks are presently sowing what you have reaped.
 
Last edited:

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
Civil unrest has already started.
A man posts a single request to which I do agree with his opinion and he receives death threats.

New object of hate: Guy who complained about older women in Yoga pants

The internet moves from object of hate, to object of hate.

Of course you would agree, your intellect prevents you from being the kind of person who can mind your own business as YOU think you can control everyone eleses actions to suit your narrative of right and wrong.

TOS.
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
If you are refering to continued attacks on the 2nd Amendment by Hillary or anyone else then yes our country will have another civil war in the near future.

And the least educated people of this country come out of the woodworks to speak.

An American, calling for a WAR within our borders where we kill each other. Why would the enemy have to attack us, when we have REDNECKED people with guns willing to kill each other?

Our enemies laugh at these kinds of thoughts, and so do we.

TOS.
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
L'amener sur. TOS premier

ITS ALREADY BEEN BROUGHT.

And you are losing.

HILLARY WINS, and as of today, there is NOTHING you or anyone else can do to stop it.

DRUMPF was the best candidate for the dems and the worst candidate for the GOP. I told you that months ago, and you refused to listen, now, its over.

TOS.
 
Top