screamin chicken
Well-Known Member
Im trying to get on the 9.5 list, tonight will make my 3 this week, only problem is I was called to work preload at 720 this am, But I was on the rd from 920 until 2038 , can I still get on the 9.5
Because he "volunteered" for extra work?Why wouldn't you?
Cuz he still drove from 9:20 to 20:38?Because he "volunteered" for extra work?
How do you make that claim from the other side of the fence?
I agree he/she was dispatched to work more than 9.5 as a driver, but don't you see how volunteering for extra work prior in the preload diffuses an employee's claim that they don't want the overtime?Cuz he still drove from 9:20 to 20:38?
Im trying to get on the 9.5 list, tonight will make my 3 this week, only problem is I was called to work preload at 720 this am, But I was on the rd from 920 until 2038 , can I still get on the 9.5
I agree he/she was dispatched to work more than 9.5 as a driver, but don't you see how volunteering for extra work prior in the preload diffuses an employee's claim that they don't want the overtime?
I was called to work preload at 720 this am
Was he/she volunteering to come in early? Or were they forced?I agree he/she was dispatched to work more than 9.5 as a driver, but don't you see how volunteering for extra work prior in the preload diffuses an employee's claim that they don't want the overtime?
A competent labor manager would surely make that argument and deadlock the grievance, why wouldn't they?
You can't live on both sides of the fence.
Nope. It's not about the OT. It's about what time one gets off work.I agree he/she was dispatched to work more than 9.5 as a driver, but don't you see how volunteering for extra work prior in the preload diffuses an employee's claim that they don't want the overtime?
A competent labor manager would surely make that argument and deadlock the grievance, why wouldn't they?
You can't live on both sides of the fence.
How is a full time driver "forced" to come in early to work the preload?Was he/she volunteering to come in early? Or were they forced?
Nope. It's not about the OT. It's about what time one gets off work.
I know that's the case for me and it's probably the case for a whole lot if people.
I would have no problem working 10+ hours a day if we started at 6am.
If he was trying to get paid for a 9.5 grievance you might have a point.That's not how the language is written.
While I understand the semantics of your statement, it really is not relevant to Art 37.
It's their "one bite of the apple", every five months.If he was trying to get paid for a 9.5 grievance you might have a point.
I don't see anyone arguing too much for him to just be put on the 9.5 list.
I guess it depends on how you look at it.Had a driver once who signed up to run early am's every day, when his seniority prevailed.
Most days his seniority did.
He did it for years, then decided that he wanted to file for 9.5 and continue to deliver the early am's.
He got laughed out of the room at the Local level hearing.
Why wouldn't he?
Depends on where you are I guess.It's their "one bite of the apple", every five months.
They are being told to protect as if it were a paying grievance, because without being on the list, there are no grievances.
Was he/she volunteering to come in early? Or were they forced?
How is a full time driver "forced" to come in early to work the preload?
We have that happen. Usually the work is offered but can be forced.How is a full time driver "forced" to come in early to work the preload?