No hit piece. The emails have been corroborated.They should fact check before they print a hit piece on someone. Thinking the senate should subpoena the CEO to get to the bottom of this.
No hit piece. The emails have been corroborated.They should fact check before they print a hit piece on someone. Thinking the senate should subpoena the CEO to get to the bottom of this.
Left is trying their hardest to blame Russia when the emails came from Hunter's laptop.No hit piece. The emails have been corroborated.
So if, say, Vladimir Putin were to purchase, say, Twitter, and started disseminating false propaganda about all levels of government in order to overthrow it, you would defend his constitutional right to do so???You think the government regulating what speech is allowed on private platforms is following the constitution. Have you read the constitution?
Yes, but I'd hope most Americans, politicians, celebrities, influencers would abandon the platform.So if, say, Vladimir Putin were to purchase, say, Twitter, and started disseminating false propaganda about all levels of government in order to overthrow it, you would defend his constitutional right to do so???
Come on man , What a dumb analogy !!! We're talking about an American company based in America , following America's constitutional laws . Not an evil foreign leader !!!So if, say, Vladimir Putin were to purchase, say, Twitter, and started disseminating false propaganda about all levels of government in order to overthrow it, you would defend his constitutional right to do so???
Not Hillary , she would be the biggest customer !!!Yes, but I'd hope most Americans, politicians, celebrities, influencers would abandon the platform.
Okay, good for her.Not Hillary , she would be the biggest customer !!!
The Constitution protects property rights. Freedom of speech is not freedom to be heard. Hypocrisy is not illegal. What is so hard to understand?Come on man , What a dumb analogy !!! We're talking about an American company based in America , following America's constitutional laws . Not an evil foreign leader !!!
I don't understand what is so difficult to understand about the first amendment .The Constitution protects property rights. Freedom of speech is not freedom to be heard. Hypocrisy is not illegal. What is so hard to understand?
You can’t when they ban news stories.
That’s called Facebook.So if, say, Vladimir Putin were to purchase, say, Twitter, and started disseminating false propaganda about all levels of government in order to overthrow it, you would defend his constitutional right to do so???
The reporter that wrote the story was too embarrassed to put their name on it. Rudy admitted he went to a tabloid because he knew a real paper would fact check and not publish.No hit piece. The emails have been corroborated.
You don't even understand what everyone else gets , the freedom of religion , expression , speech is specifically worded in the first amendment , and I'm well aware of what analogy means !!! And freedom is the key word !!!An analogy is a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
A hypothetical example is a fictional example that can be used when a speaker is explaining a complicated topic that makes the most sense when it is put into more realistic or relatable terms.
I don't understand what is so difficult to understand about the first amendment
You mean like the anonymous source that Adam Schiff had about Russia gate . To embarrassed to put a face to it !!!The reporter that wrote the story was too embarrassed to put their name on it. Rudy admitted he went to a tabloid because he knew a real paper would fact check and not publish.
That's right , it guarantees freedom of expression !!! Thank you for a slam dunk win by me that ends that story !!! And if It went to the supreme Court it would be a slam dunk for everybody !!!The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government.
Here is a hypothetical example.
I own a Christian Church. Okay,
I don't allow a Muslim cleric to speak to my congregation.
I'm limiting his ability to be heard, but not limiting his ability to speak. I own the space and have the right to control it.
HuhThat's right , it guarantees freedom of expression !!! Thank you for a slam dunk win by me that ends that story !!! And if It went to the supreme Court it would be a slam dunk for everybody !!!
Has any paper or news network that you deem "reputable" requested the contents of the hard drive?The reporter that wrote the story was too embarrassed to put their name on it. Rudy admitted he went to a tabloid because he knew a real paper would fact check and not publish.