rod
Retired 22 years
No trouble here--we just go about our separate ways. 47 years of marriage you know.Sounds like a healthy marriage. 3 votes might be an indication there's trouble at Rod Manor.
No trouble here--we just go about our separate ways. 47 years of marriage you know.Sounds like a healthy marriage. 3 votes might be an indication there's trouble at Rod Manor.
Want a chocolate?Like you're sitting at a bus stop like Forrest, Forrest Gump?
Same here! 46 years of marriage.No trouble here--we just go about our separate ways. 47 years of marriage you know.
Personally, I can't decide which is more stupid for believing all the silly stuff.
However, I did come up with mascots for the Ruskers and the Birthers.
View attachment 231401View attachment 231419
"Tu Quoque Fallacy
The “tu quoque,” Latin for “you too,” is also called the “appeal to hypocrisy” because it distracts from the argument by pointing out hypocrisy in the opponent. This tactic doesn’t solve the problem, or prove one’s point, because even hypocrites can tell the truth. Focusing on the other person’s hypocrisy is a diversionary tactic. In this way, the tu quoque typically deflects criticism away from one’s self by accusing the other person of the same problem or something comparable."
Is this the right type of fallacy?
More likely it was Opey since he has orange hair!Its been said that Andy Griffith was a Russian spy
More likely it was Opey since he has orange hair!
Used to be that way in my household. DT came along and she saw the light.Being the true Americans were are my wife voted just the opposite of me so in other words we cancelled each others vote out.
But Opey, just like the Ruskers, is easily fooled and easily led astray.Opey was too smart and bankruptcy-free to be recruited by the Russians.
Yes you are.Not a Repug or a Dim
I agree.both were just total ing idiots.
OK ... I did some research on this and as often happens with me, I found the answer in a song."Tu Quoque Fallacy
The “tu quoque,” Latin for “you too,” is also called the “appeal to hypocrisy” because it distracts from the argument by pointing out hypocrisy in the opponent. This tactic doesn’t solve the problem, or prove one’s point, because even hypocrites can tell the truth. Focusing on the other person’s hypocrisy is a diversionary tactic. In this way, the tu quoque typically deflects criticism away from one’s self by accusing the other person of the same problem or something comparable."
Is this the right type of fallacy?
And he said Pa instead of Da.Opey was too smart and bankruptcy-free to be recruited by the Russians.