floridays
Well-Known Member
You're a sharp one.my fingers are on automatic pilot
Or realize the fruits that taking a risk might benefit.you mean exploit their workers.
You're a sharp one.my fingers are on automatic pilot
Or realize the fruits that taking a risk might benefit.you mean exploit their workers.
I will take my 401k over my defined pension if I only had 1 choice. Some of the Vanguard choices have averaged 20% or more over the past 10 years. You can throw a dart at our choices and come out a winner. With the match being 55% and the tax savings you can't go wrong....hence the need for a defined benefit pension plan...
I will take my 401k over my defined pension any day. Some of the Vanguard choices have averaged 20% or more over the past 10 years. You can throw a dart at our choices and come out a winner. With the match being 55% and the tax savings you can't go wrong.
Our other pension plan is returning 4% each and every year since inception. Not a bad return.
I will take my 401k over my defined pension if I only had 1 choice. Some of the Vanguard choices have averaged 20% or more over the past 10 years. You can throw a dart at our choices and come out a winner. With the match being 55% and the tax savings you can't go wrong.
Our other pension plan is returning 4% each and every year since inception. Not a bad return.
Nope, even if my workers owned the company I couldn't afford to pay them much more than I do now. The gain I get for the risk and stress of ownership is the eventual sale price of the company. That could easily end up being $0. I've had plenty of workers over the years that are former business owners and they aren't interested in ownership anymore. They are happier with the relatively stress free job.you mean exploit their workers.
Lots of those decisions are governed my IRS rules. The OP said the need for a pension was because so many people are bad money managers. Just think if every employee ONLY had a 401k and no pension, where they can make hardship withdrawals and borrow against it and not even be in the the 401k. It could be a disaster for the idiots of the world."Our other pension plan is returning 4% each and every year since inception."
And it comes no where close to the plan it displaced. Just an idea, why don't they move the PPA to the 401k giving employees the chance of greater than 4% returns?
If your employees owned the company they wouldn't be your employees, and you wouldn't be paying them.Nope, even if my workers owned the company I couldn't afford to pay them much more than I do now. The gain I get for the risk and stress of ownership is the eventual sale price of the company. That could easily end up being $0. I've had plenty of workers over the years that are former business owners and they aren't interested in ownership anymore. They are happier with the relatively stress free job.
friend my life I need a job I have no moneyYes but the minimum score needed to pass is only 31 compared to 50 for the regular forces.
All of that is fine, you still didn't respond to my question.Lots of those decisions are governed my IRS rules. The OP said the need for a pension was because so many people are bad money managers. Just think if every employee ONLY had a 401k and no pension, where they can make hardship withdrawals and borrow against it and just not even be in the the 401k. It could be a disaster for the idiots of the world.
Toughfriend my life I need a job I have no money
If IRS rules don't allow it, why bother with the question. I have no idea of all the rules.All of that is fine, you still didn't respond to my question.
I'm smellin a little Meat, is this you young feller?CNN’S slogan is CNN, THE MOST TRUSTED NAME IN NEWS. Everyone knows this is not true, that this could, in fact, be a fraud on the American Public. There are many outlets that are far more trusted than Fake News CNN. Their slogan should be CNN, THE LEAST TRUSTED NAME IN NEWS!
It's of no concern to me how someone else manages their money. Obviously the 401k passes IRS muster. Why won't FEDEX dismantle the PPA and make a like contribution to an individual employees 401k plan?If IRS rules don't allow it, why bother with the question. I have no idea of all the rules.
I just responded about the people who are bad money managers. You let them run their own 401k and borrow, make hardship withdrawals and not even join, you will see broke people when they retire.
You are asking the wrong person. I know there are many IRS rules when it comes to 401k and pensions. Why don't you call retirement next week and get back with me with an answer,It's of no concern to me how someone else manages their money. Obviously the 401k passes IRS muster. Why won't FEDEX dismantle the PPA and make a like contribution to an individual employees 401k plan?
That shows a fundamental lack of understanding of what a sanctuary city is.No American should be separated from their loved ones because of preventable crime committed by those illegally in our country. Our cities should be Sanctuaries for Americans – not for criminal aliens!
I already know the answer, was just seeing if you did.You are asking the wrong person. I know there are many IRS rules when it comes to 401k and pensions. Why don't you call retirement next week and get back with me with an answer,
Then shareI already know the answer, was just seeing if you did.
I'll do it with a series of questions, you good with that?Then share