Caught on camera: UPS delivery driver throws packages out of truck in Wheat Ridge

[Fred's Myth]

I don’t understand your comment.

Not giving customers what they pay for is not right and will never be right.

Arguably It is in a way stealing from the customer.

Customer ordered hamburger, you think they deserve ribeye.

Allegorically speaking.

 

[Integrity]

Customer ordered hamburger, you think they deserve ribeye.

Allegorically speaking.

IMO Doesn’t fit.

 

[burrheadd]

Not sure of your point.

Justifying improper businesses practices because a Corporation is powerful and rich will not ever change the truth about the improper business practices. Not giving customers what they pay for is not right and will never be right.

Arguably It is in a way stealing from the customer.

So,if they were to charge less would it be ok to “toss” them around?

 

[Integrity]

So,if they were to charge less would it be ok to “toss” them around?

No.

 

[Operational needs]

Even in the bathroom ?

You hear in the news all the time of someone finding a camera in a bathroom.

 

[oldngray]

You hear in the news all the time of someone finding a camera in a bathroom.

"for security purposes only"

 

[Indecisi0n]

You hear in the news all the time of someone finding a camera in a bathroom.

You can't prove its mine.

 

[burrheadd]

You hear in the news all the time of someone finding a camera in a bathroom.

I used to play softball with a guy that owned some suntan shops

he had cameras pointed at the tanning beds

he got caught
he got locked up for a few years

 

[brownmonster]

I used to play softball with a guy that owned some suntan shops

he had cameras pointed at the tanning beds

he got caught
he got locked up for a few years

How were the pictures?

 

[OrioN]

I don’t understand your comment.

I'm a bit naive, but I understood it..

If that shipper pay for just getting it to the destination with no signature required or white glove service, then you'll have workers caring less about the job

Aka FXG... for the most part.

 

[Integrity]

I'm a bit naive, but I understood it..

If that shipper pay for just getting it to the destination with no signature required or white glove service, then you'll have workers caring less about the job

Aka FXG... for the most part.

I don’t get it.

 

[burrheadd]

I don’t get it.

Do you have a learning disability?

 

[Integrity]

Do you have a learning disability?

No.

 

[Justaloader]

"Hand to surface" isn't on the books to protect the package. It's to protect UPS when a worker lifts a box incorrectly and then has to file a WC claim. "Did you use proper lifting and package handling methods? If so, please recite for us what those methods are. Oh, you can't recite them? Claim denied!" - signed Liberty Mutual.

 

[Integrity]

"Hand to surface" isn't on the books to protect the package. It's to protect UPS when a worker lifts a box incorrectly and then has to file a WC claim. "Did you use proper lifting and package handling methods? If so, please recite for us what those methods are. Oh, you can't recite them? Claim denied!" - signed Liberty Mutual.

Disagree.

 

[no_map_needed]

If that was my route, any package for Joe would be lost and anything going to fox 31 would be delivered at 4:59pm for now on.

This homo should've gone to the back of the truck instead of being a pusillanimous stalker to see maybe that the driver couldn't even get to the back due to bulk. I too would laugh with the helper if I saw the load.

 

[OrioN]

Do your union backed hourly job correctly... follow the methods and management can't target u.

Don't retaliate against the guy who took the video, that's just too petty.

Just have the mindset that u are being watched anytime you are on route <shrugs>

Sure, save him as the last stop if u wish

 

[OrioN]

"Hand to surface" isn't on the books to protect the package.

It's definitely to minimize damages to packages...


U use correct body mechanics to protect your self

 

[Justaloader]

It's definitely to minimize damages to packages...


U use correct body mechanics to protect your self

Lmao - spend 10 minutes in my hub and watch how "loading" is handled, and then tell me "it's to protect the package". That's bull. If they were concerned about damages to packages - the TV's that come down the belt and roller lines that are clearly marked "Fragile, do not lay flat, do not stack" - that are lying on the side with other boxes piled on top of them....that wouldn't happen. Add to that when they are loaded, they are often laid on their side and stuff is stacked on top of them (depending on where the box is placed in the "wall" that the loader is building). I've seen it with everything from a 27 inch to a 55 inch TV. (Usually anything bigger than a 55 is brought around via the irreg train instead of the conveyor system). That is just one example.

I can take a video of trailers being loaded and show you just how "careful" folks attempt to be with packages.

Hand to surface is part of the mechanics of lifting/moving a package (along with each hand on opposite corners, bending your knees, etc) - which is in place to protect the company (as they don't want you getting hurt while performing your job).

 

[OrioN]

I already knows what happens inside the warehouses... those tv's and other irreg should've been on tugs, non conveyables...

It's when the drivers are out on route where we finally have to maintain the illusion that we care, LoL so ... white glove service from this FXG driver, even though I'm being compensated less for it