Constitutional Crisis

Rutherford B Hays

gun accipere, et abire cannoli
Add all Politicians and pretty much everybody else.
I personally have never run across anyone who was not a hypocrite.
200 (2).gif
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Or a Nixon. The same thing happened 45 years ago only different players in the game today.
45 years ago Republican operatives broke into the DNC office. Today Democrat and Republican operatives opposed to the Trump presidency worked behind the scenes to create a phony narrative about Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. Much hay has been made on this forum about the resulting arrests from the Mueller investigation, none of which involved Trump or his campaign. Arrests are about to happen involving various actors who used unverified documents as a pretense to spy on The Trump campaign and to leak salacious details to the media in hopes of derailing Trump's presidency. If you think they aren't serious about this keep in mind that the DOJ IG doesn't have prosecutory power but the Federal prosecutor newly appointed to investigate how this whole situation started certainly does. And in the last few days Comey, McCabe, Clapper, Brennan, and others have started pointing fingers at each other and others. You folks have been so certain that Trump did everything they were claiming, and can't seem to grasp you were manipulated into believing a pack of lies. I understand your objections to Trump. He's the total opposite of how you think a government should operate. But these behind the scenes guys used that against you, whipping up liberal sentiment in hopes that Congress would impeach and remove him to make you happy. The moral of this story? Put up a legitimate candidate as your nominee and if you lose accept the results as graciously as you expect the other side to if you win. Otherwise our democracy won't continue if this division gets exploited to the point of no return.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
45 years ago Republican operatives broke into the DNC office. Today Democrat and Republican operatives opposed to the Trump presidency worked behind the scenes to create a phony narrative about Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. Much hay has been made on this forum about the resulting arrests from the Mueller investigation, none of which involved Trump or his campaign. Arrests are about to happen involving various actors who used unverified documents as a pretense to spy on The Trump campaign and to leak salacious details to the media in hopes of derailing Trump's presidency. If you think they aren't serious about this keep in mind that the DOJ IG doesn't have prosecutory power but the Federal prosecutor newly appointed to investigate how this whole situation started certainly does. And in the last few days Comey, McCabe, Clapper, Brennan, and others have started pointing fingers at each other and others. You folks have been so certain that Trump did everything they were claiming, and can't seem to grasp you were manipulated into believing a pack of lies. I understand your objections to Trump. He's the total opposite of how you think a government should operate. But these behind the scenes guys used that against you, whipping up liberal sentiment in hopes that Congress would impeach and remove him to make you happy. The moral of this story? Put up a legitimate candidate as your nominee and if you lose accept the results as graciously as you expect the other side to if you win. Otherwise our democracy won't continue if this division gets exploited to the point of no return.
If the Trump campaign hadn't met with and encouraged Russians to meddle in our election we wouldn't be in this situation.
 

turq

Well-Known Member
none of which involved Trump or his campaign

WTF His campaign manager was meeting with Russian oligarchs and had shady deals with Ukranians for years? Did you ever ask yourself how the hell did Manafort get to be his campaign manager? And what about Michael Flynn of the famous "lock her up" fame? You can not say there was no shady dealing going on. And for the record 45 years ago was also when the "Saturday night massacre" happened.

They want to investigate the origins...go for it. But for the AG to announce it as "spying" when you state in front of congress that you have no evidence of that, in fact you have not even looked at any evidence of it....is nothing but political BS.
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
WTF His campaign manager was meeting with Russian oligarchs and had shady deals with Ukranians for years? Did you ever ask yourself how the hell did Manafort get to be his campaign manager? And what about Michael Flynn of the famous "lock her up" fame? You can not say there was no shady dealing going on. And for the record 45 years ago was also when the "Saturday night massacre" happened.

They want to investigate the origins...go for it. But for the AG to announce it as "spying" when you state in front of congress that you have no evidence of that, in fact you have not even looked at any evidence of it....is nothing but political BS.

During the Senate hearing with Barr, Lindsey Graham stated outright that he hadn’t read the entire Report, but he was all set.

Lmao, he’s the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Umkay.

Redirect Notice...Lindsey Graham admits...
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
WTF His campaign manager was meeting with Russian oligarchs and had shady deals with Ukranians for years? Did you ever ask yourself how the hell did Manafort get to be his campaign manager? And what about Michael Flynn of the famous "lock her up" fame? You can not say there was no shady dealing going on. And for the record 45 years ago was also when the "Saturday night massacre" happened.

They want to investigate the origins...go for it. But for the AG to announce it as "spying" when you state in front of congress that you have no evidence of that, in fact you have not even looked at any evidence of it....is nothing but political BS.
Mueller said no, you lose . Again
 

turq

Well-Known Member
Mueller said no, you lose . Again

Not only are you ignorant, you're dishonest. Saying and posting things you know are not true. But I guess that is par for the course for someone who's idol is the liar in chief . back to ignoring you.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Not only are you ignorant, you're dishonest. Saying and posting things you know are not true. But I guess that is par for the course for someone who's idol is the liar in chief . back to ignoring you.

sorry Mueller said no , no redue's no consolation. man up and learn to accept your defeat snowflake

by the way if you keep reading my posts then you're not ignoring . Who's dishonest now?
 
Top