stevetheupsguy
sʇǝʌǝʇɥǝndsƃnʎ
He's not a behind, he's only hands.You ought to quit while your behind.

He's not a behind, he's only hands.You ought to quit while your behind.
He's not a behind, he's only hands.![]()
That would be profound had you not sold me stock in "OUR" company.
Looks like Tie missed with that "foul" ball boys and girls.
How's a public labor war helping your stock?
Not sure, but you seem really concerned.
Maybe you could pull some strings and get your boys in New Jersey to start playing fair and start abiding by the contract.
You talk to the Edison management team and I'll see what I can do about getting that plane to fly backwards and take it all back.
Yes you are correct. Lending institutions that failed to make loans that people couldn't afford were black-mailed by the Federal Government. It all comes down to personal responsibility. If people had not taken on mortgages they knew they had no hope of repaying, none of this would have happened.Greed in an indirect way. Political greed by our politicians being influenced by the greed of special interest groups.
But clearly the housing bubble was caused by excessively loosening up the credit standards. Thus many people got mortgages that could not reasonably afford them. Lending institutions that did not make those loans available were sued or embarassed into submission. Those that over leveraged their buying power with interest only loans or those that bought houses they could not afford were the first to default. Those that lost their jobs after the economic collapse were next.
Nothing reinforces this point more then our government tightening lending requirements this past April. Something that would normally be unthought of during an economic recession when loosening the flow of money is needed to recover.
Yes you are correct. Lending institutions that failed to make loans that people couldn't afford were black-mailed by the Federal Government. It all comes down to personal responsibility. If people had not taken on mortgages they knew they had no hope of repaying, none of this would have happened.
It is certainly easier to find a dirty manager than a dirty hourly.
Did you just wake up? Cause you live in one heck of a fantasy world.
Originally Posted by Bubblehead
Don't think so, PARTNER!!!
Oh man, stop the madness.
You hate the Company.
You hate Management.
You hate the way things are run.
You will not sell your stock $$.
Typical Teamster, you don't know what you want.![]()
I'm typical, so take it easy with that blanket.Originally Posted by Bubblehead
Don't think so, PARTNER!!!
Oh man, stop the madness.
You hate the Company.
You hate Management.
You hate the way things are run.
You will not sell your stock $$.
Typical Teamster, you don't know what you want.![]()
I won't criticize you, though I would have after your first few posts on Brown Café. You sounded like quite the um, "supe/mngr". Now you sound like a pretty decent person that's at least a little open minded. Honestly dragon, aren't good, honest, fair supes/mngr's few and far between? I don't mean nicey nicey, I mean good, honest, and fair.You would criticize even if you didn't hold stock.
Frustrated aren't ya?
That's it?
Thanks for the investment advise.
Thinking my minimal sharehold is worth the loss considering it entitles me to criticize your lack of managerial skills.
In my 28 years every manager I've dealt with but maybe one was dirty in some way, shape or form. .
That is being awfully gracious of a job description for an entry-level, bargain basement supervisor role. ;/
Well there are many sides to any issue. I can see your point of view. With then Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan's positive views, the ever rising stock markets, and the innovative no-down, interest only loans; it was near impossible for anyone to resist. And most who really studied the fine print figured they could sell their homes for a good profit before the loans readjusted.I disagree.
If you are offered your own home, for less rent then you pay... now who wouldn't take that ?
And, basically promised a profit, by the house being more worth in the future.
Just alone, less mortgage then rent... would get anyone interessted.
The banks put out such a bait, that almost any fish would have biten !
I seen the whole story about that.
Wall Street, Financial and mortgage companies selling housings funds to make a PROFIT... , only problem was, more and more invested into it, and they needed more realestate. So, they started selling to almost anyone.
(all thanks to deregulation from Ronnie R).
It came to a burst.
Anything that is highly invested in, comes to a burst.
Such as tech stocks in 2000.
Gold might be ready to burst soon, too.
All depends on the US dollar now.
If it manages to stay steady, so will gold.
But, if it keeps diving... then the US dollar will be replaced, by probably the Euro for commidity trading (and gold will burst).
If the dollar heads back up to where it was... Gold will also burst.
It's a fragile market out there.
1. I don't hate the company, but don't like it's change of direction in recent years. This company still provides me the opportunity to provide my family a good life.
2. I don't hate management, at least not the ones I know first hand. I do hate the fact that the ones I know aren't afforded the latitude to make crucial front line decisions.
3. The only one he got right is I definitely do not like the way things are run. This era of trickle down management stinks.
Does that make me a typical Teamster...probably.
I most assuredly know what I want but am wise enough to know that it will make very little difference at UPS.