Family sues Tesla after 15yo dies....automated vehicles....sure.

Off the leash

Off the leash

Well-Known Member
Brownslave688 said:
The phone thing is a total myth. Those are feel good stickers. Nothing more. Nothing official about those at all.

In the grand scheme of hydrogen as a fuel source I see safe fueling as a fairly minor last hurdle.
Click to expand...
Figured as much with the phones. I always thought it was static electricity. It would be nice to see a new safe fuel. Not until they run out of oil I’m afraid.
 
Q

quad decade guy

Well-Known Member
Brownslave688 said:
Yeah I’m sure technology hasn’t changed at all since the Hindenburg. Lmao. Come on man
Click to expand...
So, brain-man.....why aren't there Hindenburgs flying all over the place? Come on man.....exactly now. The wave of the future....right? A near endless supply of fuel for the engines.....just think of the range....huge heavy-lift cargo ships.....darkening the sky....a waste product of just water....all our problems solved. LMAO......lololololol.
 
Brownslave688

Brownslave688

You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
quad decade guy said:
So, brain-man.....why aren't there Hindenburgs flying all over the place? Come on man.....exactly now. The wave of the future....right? A near endless supply of fuel for the engines.....just think of the range....huge heavy-lift cargo ships.....darkening the sky....a waste product of just water....all our problems solved. LMAO......lololololol.
Click to expand...
Thats your argument? Why didn’t a giant ballon become the wave of the future? Wow


Stick around maybe you’ll learn something. Hydrogen is safer than gas.

Hydrogen is 14 times lighter than air and 57 times lighter than gasoline vapor. This means vapors quickly rise into the atmosphere. Gas pools around the ground.

Hydrogen has a lower radiant heat than conventional gasoline, meaning the air around the flame of hydrogen is not as hot as around a gasoline flame. Therefore, the risk of hydrogen secondary fires is lower.

Hydrogen has a higher oxygen requirement for explosion than fossil fuels. Hydrogen can be explosive with oxygen concentrations between 18 and 59 percent while gasoline can be explosive at oxygen concentrations between 1 and 3 percent. This means that gasoline has greater risk for explosion than hydrogen for any given environment with oxygen.
 
gamecock65

gamecock65

Member
LOL you think these huge corporations that could save billions in costs care about a few deaths? They'll settle out of court and keep moving. Self-driving vehicles will be here eventually.
 
Off the leash

Off the leash

Well-Known Member
Brownslave688 said:
Thats your argument? Why didn’t a giant ballon become the wave of the future? Wow


Stick around maybe you’ll learn something. Hydrogen is safer than gas.

Hydrogen is 14 times lighter than air and 57 times lighter than gasoline vapor. This means vapors quickly rise into the atmosphere. Gas pools around the ground.

Hydrogen has a lower radiant heat than conventional gasoline, meaning the air around the flame of hydrogen is not as hot as around a gasoline flame. Therefore, the risk of hydrogen secondary fires is lower.

Hydrogen has a higher oxygen requirement for explosion than fossil fuels. Hydrogen can be explosive with oxygen concentrations between 18 and 59 percent while gasoline can be explosive at oxygen concentrations between 1 and 3 percent. This means that gasoline has greater risk for explosion than hydrogen for any given environment with oxygen.
Click to expand...
The internet is a wonderful thing
 
DumbTruckDriver

DumbTruckDriver

Allergic to cardboard.
quad decade guy said:
So, brain-man.....why aren't there Hindenburgs flying all over the place? Come on man.....exactly now. The wave of the future....right? A near endless supply of fuel for the engines.....just think of the range....huge heavy-lift cargo ships.....darkening the sky....a waste product of just water....all our problems solved. LMAO......lololololol.
Click to expand...
The Hindenburg wasn’t fueled by hydrogen. And that was almost 90 years ago.
 
542thruNthru

542thruNthru

Well-Known Member
DumbTruckDriver said:
The Hindenburg wasn’t fueled by hydrogen. And that was almost 90 years ago.
Click to expand...

IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U said:
Actually was filled with hydrogen Even though that was not the original design.
Click to expand...

gdecristofaro said:
Excuse me, but the Hindenburg was filled with Hydrogen. That’s why it exploded. That safer than gasoline substance was susceptible to static discharge from its tethering pole. It was not propelled by it
Click to expand...
Guys... He's saying that the Hindenburg wasn't fueled by hydrogen. Yes it was filled with it but it was fueled by Diesel.
 
Off the leash

Off the leash

Well-Known Member
542thruNthru said:
Guys... He's saying that the Hindenburg wasn't fueled by hydrogen. Yes it was filled with it but it was fueled by Diesel.
Click to expand...
That’s what I said, it wasn’t propelled by it. I’m sure that point was comforting to the people that got roasted alive. Help I’m on fire! Don’t worry it’s fueled bu diesel!
 
542thruNthru

542thruNthru

Well-Known Member
gdecristofaro said:
Your loss bozo
Click to expand...
tenor-123.gif
 
Top