You obviously haven't read it, or you'd understand that your comment is off base. The article is not slanted liberal and it's not slanted conservative. It's information about both liberals and conservatives and why they are how they are and why they lean either way politically.
Clown, look at the post you responded to..... first sentence I stated clearly, I hadn't read it yet. This may be a good illustration of conservative and liberal.
I guess your eyes were pooping all over the screen looking for something to pop up. I'll train on the image or target and anticipate what to expect or look for. You exposed yourself, I didn't read past your initial statement, I will however, it puts me inside your kitchen, I can predict your every move.
Your comment suggests you're not an open minded person though. It suggests you go into things with preconceived notions before you've even begun to try to understand a topic, which by the way, is a very common thing for conservatives, who are noted for their rigidity and preset of defined thoughts they tend to cling to, even when presented with scientific evidence to the contrary - I didn't make this up, it's been studied. (I know, I know, it's the liberal academics
ting all over conservatives again)
I've now mentioned several times, that I'd like this to be an on topic discussion with people who've read the articles or even post some articles with contrary findings. I realize I'm not on a website rich with college graduates and/or voracious readers, but this should be easy enough - read the article or another like it, which you share here, and we can discuss them, or don't participate in the thread. Not difficult.
