newfie
Well-Known Member
funny how the defund the police group now loves the FBIWell, for one, the FBI is known as the Men in Black, not blue…
funny how the defund the police group now loves the FBIWell, for one, the FBI is known as the Men in Black, not blue…
...maybe caught a big ol' dose of the monkeypox?
...maybe caught a big ol' dose of the monkeypox?
Nice plumage. But has a beak like a church-key. And so does the bird.
Doesn't matter. Prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Turn up said documents at Trump's place and slam dunk. Cart everything away and discover documents later, yeah good luck with that.There will be people singing like canaries when the investigation tightens around them. Just watch.
You don't just accidentally end up with TS/SCI documents. He ordered those documents be signed out for whether he did it himself or otherwise.
This was no accident and nobody planted thison him.
Watermelon?Homeboy and his beotch probably stole all sorts of things: classified docs, silverware, chicken, BBQ....
Surveillance video might clench it. Fingerprints. He’s in trouble.Doesn't matter. Prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Turn up said documents at Trump's place and slam dunk. Cart everything away and discover documents later, yeah good luck with that.
Funny how the “support the troops” and “blue lives matter” group supports an EX-president who draft dodged and never once visited the cops who got their asses beat on January 6funny how the defund the police group now loves the FBI
He could've handled the documents while president. And if you cart away everything then discover the documents later how do you prove in court they weren't planted? Reasonable doubt.Surveillance video might clench it. Fingerprints. He’s in trouble.
With the way the FBI has become it would be unreasonable not to doubt them.He could've handled the documents while president. And if you cart away everything then discover the documents later how do you prove in court they weren't planted? Reasonable doubt.
FBI also seized a lot of documents they had no right to see. Are we supposed believe they will forget what they saw? FBI also rejected an independent third party review what was privileged.He could've handled the documents while president. And if you cart away everything then discover the documents later how do you prove in court they weren't planted? Reasonable doubt.
They come across as extremely arrogant and they decide what is and isn't the law.FBI also seized a lot of documents they had no right to see. Are we supposed believe they will forget what they saw? FBI also rejected an independent third party review what was privileged.
They don't care about due process violations. Or the Constitution.They come across as extremely arrogant and they decide what is and isn't the law.
Of course he could have. But there might be fingerprints on these documents of other people that should not have access to this information. That's a huge no-no, obviously.He could've handled the documents while president.
It'll come down to a lot of variables, but yes, the jury might have to decide between the word of law enforcement or a lying, angry ex-game show host turned ex-president who stole government documents. lolAnd if you cart away everything then discover the documents later how do you prove in court they weren't planted? Reasonable doubt.
Politically driven Storm troopersThey come across as extremely arrogant and they decide what is and isn't the law.
"The mocker seeks wisdom and finds none,
but knowledge comes easily to the discerning."
you got him ...this time.......maybe.....enjoy your red meatSurveillance video might clench it. Fingerprints. He’s in trouble.