not to get too far off track, but I'm just curious - has this thread become an official urinating contest yet, or are we still working up to it?... just need to know for scoring purposes. Thanks!
taste?Good question.. I'll print up the scorecards if you want... What would you say, scoring based on volume, distance, color and duration?
taste?
not to get too far off track, but I'm just curious - has this thread become an official urinating contest yet, or are we still working up to it?... just need to know for scoring purposes. Thanks!
Must be all that extra pressure MT3 puts on your prostate nightly.Hey, I could piss-on MT3 from at least 15 feet away. bbsam can only make it 10 feet.
Must be all that extra pressure MT3 puts on your prostate nightly.![]()
For one, the argument is FedEx bought and built ground in the beginning from the profits of express. That's fact. Secondly it's stated right there in the financial report, the write off for new planes and the buyouts came from express profits. And these are the reasons for the 0% margin.
The reputation of Fedex will continue to erode with the expanding Ground Opco.
You can't take a bunch of mostly criminals, drug addicts and high school dropouts and give them the keys to a Ground truck and expect to keep a "Federal Express" type reputation, advertising dollars can only do so much.
can you anti-Ground zealots explain why Ground keeps increasing its market share if its drivers are as bad as you say they are?
Either you're exaggerating, most customers don't really care who hands them a box, or both.
They don't want to except the obvious that markets are determining the reduction of express and increase towards ground. Now is there any shenanigans? Perhaps some, but overall it's the market talking
To me there is no reason for a Express driver to have issue with a Ground Driver or vice versa, but several here have seemed to take that on. Damn, it's just people trying to support their own. Attacking the 1%'ers I get. Fighting with ourselves at the bottom.... big mistake.
No argument there. People aren't going to pay a premium for expedited service when they don't need it, nor will they pay big money on a 90 mile overnight trip when a much cheaper option is available.
I think it's funny, at least here. To hear some of the Express couriers here tell it, you'd think that there is a world of difference between the job duties of a Ground driver and an Express courier, but Express couriers could easily do the jobs of high level executives.
No argument there. People aren't going to pay a premium for expedited service when they don't need it, nor will they pay big money on a 90 mile overnight trip when a much cheaper option is available.
I think it's funny, at least here. To hear some of the Express couriers here tell it, you'd think that there is a world of difference between the job duties of a Ground driver and an Express courier, but Express couriers could easily do the jobs of high level executives.
Many moons ago, I worked in radio. The guys there were raising hell about how the suits were killing music radio by gutting the live talent in favor of voice-tracking and getting rid of tech folks in favor of automation. The listener never noticed and it saved tons of money. Once the listeners found out, they didn't care. Just have the DJ sound entertaining and play good music. That was supposed to kill music radio but it never did.
The same goes for Ground. Whatever you give up in quality is made up by saving money. Most people don't care. People can argue and complain about it, but it won't change the math.
Dano you're so full of BS and your bit about radio listeners not noticing anything is way off. Go back to waxing Fred's limo.
But what about the people waiting to finalize a very expensive contract sitting in a room with no documents.