Everything I said is 100% verifiable.
* Oh.... you negative rep me, on anything related to the constitution and
personal freedom. *
Hillary is never going to be President. Get over it.
Now you just look like a bigot deflecting from his inaccurate post. Sad.
Do you have an argument? All I see are posts ridiculing others.Wrong.
Really? You must be a forgettable person I don't recall any of your posts.
* Oh.... btw I carry and have more guns than I need. You didn't post anything about the constitution or freedom so frankly I don't know what the hell you're talking about.
Good. Nothing to get over.
That will work greatly since I can still see them.The biggest transgressor is you. It's gotten so bad you delete your own posts before I even report them lol. Sad.
Maybe I'll start doing the same.
Who did I ridicule?Do you have an argument? All I see are posts ridiculing others.
That’s his MO.Do you have an argument? All I see are posts ridiculing others.
In the case of the most recent shooting I believe his first victims were outside the school. Knowing places are armed vs not armed is enough motivation for these guys to go else where. They aren’t looking for a gun fight, they are looking to massacre people. The mere presence of security was enough to force Colorado shooter to choose a theater over an airport. Schools should be the last place these guys want to go, guard the children.So a scenario of a local sports complex that is a gun free zone would be better off with guns allowed?
I don’t recall such places being rife with mass shootings.
I imagine that considering the intensity of sports competition, alcohol being served, and weapons being abundant would cause more problems.
Really this logic is flawed from the beginning. Saying that having more guns in currently gun free zones would reduce gun violence is a statement without proof.
Consider schools. Think about armed teachers. Are these school shooters deranged? Probably. Stupid? Probably not.
So a school shooter enters a classroom. Who’s the first one shot? Teacher of course. The rest of the class is at the mercy of the gunman. What’s solved by arming the teachers? Likely the death count goes up because the deranged killer will be confined to a room with 25 to 30 targets. Who knows how far away the next armed teacher is? How many lethal shots can the shooter get off? Will the next armed teacher come alone and just be outgunned?
Really, it’s an idea that really solves nothing. It’s a “feel good” idea for the right wing.
Who's arguing against security guards?Knowing places are armed vs not armed is enough motivation for these guys to go else where. The mere presence of security was enough to force Colorado shooter to choose a theater over an airport. Schools should be the last place these guys want to go, guard the children.
NobodyWho's arguing against security guards?
Shhh.Nobody
Right now they are focused on the teacher aspect. That’s fine, argue it all you want and post snowflakes not wanting to protect children all you want. They are also arguing against putting guns in schools all together.Who's arguing against security guards?
They work great. I’ve delivered to a school that has one. Sits at a kiosk at the front door. Has cameras at every door. You have to be buzzed in. But they do have glass doors. Don’t think it would stop terminator.Who's arguing against security guards?
Seems to me both sides of the debate are in constant search of a problem for their solutions. They both pounce on these events to push an agenda. Pushing more guns vs pushing less, both are stupid arguments.Right now they are focused on the teacher aspect. That’s fine, argue it all you want and post snowflakes not wanting to protect children all you want. They are also arguing against putting guns in schools all together.
Why Armed Guards at Schools Won’t Work
They are putting forth a weak argument of having armed guards increases the chance of violence in a robbery. These mass shooting are not robbery, money is far from the motivation in these killers head.
School shootings are rare. We don't need to ban gun free zones. We don't need to ban guns. We don't need to arm teachers. We don't need armed guards. We don't need to blame it on mental health, or violent TV movies and video games.
I never said I was against getting rid of gun free zones.
Same here. Seems designed to keep out the perverts not the killers.They work great. I’ve delivered to a school that has one. Sits at a kiosk at the front door. Has cameras at every door. You have to be buzzed in. But they do have glass doors. Don’t think it would stop terminator.