UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
How would you know? You don't work for FedEx.
Post it.
If you want to cite confidentiality just post the portion pertaining to this issue.
How would you know? You don't work for FedEx.
You don't work for FedEx. Why would you care what our policies are?Post it.
If you want to cite confidentiality just post the portion pertaining to this issue.
I've seen it both posted at station and read to us in a meeting. Had to sign a page and return that to mgr....which means it doesn't exist...
If that is truly the case Dan then you should know that they can not post such a policy on line.Or are you trying to help a relative out with a feather in cap for firing someone Dan,The local SM is married to my former niece. Shouldn't be a problem.
Oh yes it would be a big problem. If security caught wind that the SM was giving out information like that to a UPS employee, there would be undeniable consequences.The local SM is married to my former niece. Shouldn't be a problem.
Makes one smell a rat doesn't it?If that is truly the case Dan then you should know that they can not post such a policy on line.Or are you trying to help a relative out with a feather in cap for firing someone Dan,
I highly doubt giving out that kind of info would result in undeniable consequences. It's not like he would be giving out any insider information like the running of operations, etc.Oh yes it would be a big problem. If security caught wind that the SM was giving out information like that to a UPS employee, there would be undeniable consequences.
Nonetheless it would take balls of brass to even make such a request.I highly doubt giving out that kind of info would result in undeniable consequences. It's not like he would be giving out any insider information like the running of operations, etc.
It does beg the question, what empirical data are you privy to? After all, you're just a courier, right? And when have I said anything of the sort anyways? I've heard in numerous locations mgrs saying we would top out in 7-8 years. What empirical data does that dispute? Anything else I've said that disputes empirical data? Or is it your job to discredit and marginalize those of us who might be close to the truth? You'll say anything to keep FedEx looking like our benevolent benefactor.
Oh yes it would be a big problem. If security caught wind that the SM was giving out information like that to a UPS employee, there would be undeniable consequences.
Nonetheless it would take balls of brass to even make such a request.
No, you specifically said my observations contradict all the empirical data. What empirical data do you have access to? Why do you have such access? After all you're just a courier, right?My post pointed out that the world doesn't necessarily reflect absolutely verbatim your personal experiences. Thank you for another rambling overreaction.
P.S. I gave an 8 sentence response. Do you live on Twitter? 8 sentences too much for you?My post pointed out that the world doesn't necessarily reflect absolutely verbatim your personal experiences. Thank you for another rambling overreaction.
Well then I guess it's perfectly fine to let Upstate come down to an Express station in full uniform so he can look over the whole policy book.Yeah, security would be ALL OVER someone who told a UPS employee the policy on cell phone usage. They'd probably shoot someone for that.
They are basically Fred S's personal KBGYeah, security would be ALL OVER someone who told a UPS employee the policy on cell phone usage. They'd probably shoot someone for that.
You are doing a bangup job of coming across as an absolute loser AND troll.The local SM is married to my former niece. Shouldn't be a problem.
So then why ask someone to post the policy if you can get ahold of the policy yourself? I mean other than to be a know it all troll.The local SM is married to my former niece. Shouldn't be a problem.
The local SM is married to my former niece. Shouldn't be a problem.
And you've never done that before have you Dan? How many forced ignore are you up to now?I would post a picture but it might violate TOS.