Gave you a beer. This needed its own thread and not buried six pages into the other one I saw it in.
I like this guyRespect.
If only our leadership tried half as hard....Tyler Binder? Lol he tries
Are you?Tyler Binder? Lol he tries
Of course he does. He is on a forum like you! HAAre you?
All of these 7 IBT Vice President's who have written letters asking for an
emergency Executive Board meeting, are doing it for show.
Poor little Tyler Binder, should read the IBT constitution.
He keeps trying to blame Denis T, who is just doing as he was told.
Judicial Powers
Section 2(a)
"The General President shall have authority to interpret the Constitution and laws of the International Union, including the authority to interpret theBylaws of subordinate bodies, and to decide all questions of law thereunder between meetings of the General Executive Board."
https://teamster.filecamp.com/0/teamster/binary/25np-re7bjk5k.pdf
All of these 7 IBT Vice President's who have written letters asking for an
emergency Executive Board meeting, are doing it for show.
Don't think Hoffa hasn't consulted with the IBT's legal team.
-Bug-
Sure, the General President has the authority to make interpretations and decisions. The question everybody has right now is: Why make such interpretations and decisions that are clearly in favor of the Company and not the majority of voting members when he doesn't have to?
What were the other options ?
Call a strike.... when you have the potential for 120,000 non-voters cross
the picket line ? No one is to blame but the members.
National leadership should put on their big boy pants and deal with the issues members have with the Contract.
Before the change, it was a super majority to vote down a contract,regardless of participationIf people remember, the first thing the IBT did before contract negotiations
started was send UPS a copy of the IBT constitution. And they can read.
What were the other options ?
Call a strike.... when you have the potential for 120,000 non-voters cross
the picket line ? No one is to blame but the members.
Blame Ron Carey and TDU, for putting the 50% 2/3 language in the constitution.
-Bug-
Before the change, it was a super majority to vote down a contract,regardless of participation
The majority of the UPS members (non-voters) didn't have a problem with it.
How much easier could the IBT make it to vote ?
And the ease of the voting process doesn’t really have anything to do with what leadership should do now anyway.
The majority of the UPS members (non-voters) didn't have a problem with it.