Jeans allowed in management now
- Thread starter TearsInRain
- Start date
Covemastah
Hoopah drives the boat Chief !!
Mmmm ,,, big butttts need lovin too !!
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
It's only descrimination if they don't hire you because of your appearance.lol. Something I do not understand is how visible tattoos are still something to talk about. Think about all of the things HR at ANY job protects under the different 'protected class' rules. There are far more people in this world with tattoos, let alone beards for Christ's sake, than make up the individuals who fall under Most of the 'protected class' lists. They allow Mohawks to slide at our center, but not day-old stubble. So friend@*%*$g stupid.
Only a few local governments – including Washington, D.C.; Madison, Wisconsin; Santa Cruz, California; and Urbana, Illinois – currently prohibit discrimination based on “personal appearance,” which would include discrimination for visible body art. Sam’s Club, Inc. v. Madison EEOC, 668 N.W.2d 562 (Wis. App. 2003).
I reside and work in WI, none of us are allowed to have visible tattoosover 40% of 18-40 year olds have tattoos. Sounds to me that is the demographic they are looking for drivers in.
Local 705 for life
Well-Known Member
I have seen it all this would never have been allowed in the 80s or 90s brother this just the beginning of the changes. They are on a path of destruction.
The Driver
I drive.
Why hide him?
burrheadd
KING Of GIFS
lol. Something I do not understand is how visible tattoos are still something to talk about. Think about all of the things HR at ANY job protects under the different 'protected class' rules. There are far more people in this world with tattoos, let alone beards for Christ's sake, than make up the individuals who fall under Most of the 'protected class' lists. They allow Mohawks to slide at our center, but not day-old stubble. So friend@*%*$g stupid.
Only a few local governments – including Washington, D.C.; Madison, Wisconsin; Santa Cruz, California; and Urbana, Illinois – currently prohibit discrimination based on “personal appearance,” which would include discrimination for visible body art. Sam’s Club, Inc. v. Madison EEOC, 668 N.W.2d 562 (Wis. App. 2003).
I reside and work in WI, none of us are allowed to have visible tattoos
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
Or hire them in the first place.
Its everywhere. I saw it today and think it looks very unprofessional. Beards and facial hair are next. I'm okay with the beards but the jeans are a deal breaker as far as respect goes.
KOG72
I’m full of it
Maybe i’ll Go out and get me some barb wire tattoos on both my arms,lol
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
Go hide with your dinosaurs.
Thats what I was told.
burrheadd
KING Of GIFS
While your at it get one of those bad ass neck tattoos like the fdx ground guys all sport
oldngray
nowhere special
Don't forget to throw in a few body piercings too.
KOG72
I’m full of it
Get a couple on my legs too
KOG72
I’m full of it
Prince Albert????
BSWALKS
Fugitive From Reality
I'll take things @Indecisi0n says for $500, Alex.
sailfish
Master of Karate and Friendship for Everyone
Good thing we have you.
sailfish
Master of Karate and Friendship for Everyone
Yeah. Jeans are the beginning of the ultimate path of destruction. JFC.
Pablo Escobar
Active Member
Who even cares what management does?! Do your job and go home. Stop looking at your bosses bottom
Few tear tats too, so everyone respects you cuz youve killed people!
