Local Unions Against TA and Local TA's???

[kingOFchester]

It's always like this. People talk a tough game.

Locals not endorsing contract?

 

[Anonymous 10]

Locals not endorsing contract?

Yup. It happens every time. Elected union officials are politicians and they have agendas. The guy from local 89 ran against Hoffa. He obviously lost and is a soar loser.

 

[anonymous4]

What other locals are saying no? I heard 804 is suggesting no.

 

[Anonymous 10]

Who knows. All I can say, I feel as though this contract is not in my best interest.

It might not be but the rising cost of healthcare and the accounting liability is a major sticking point for the company. Wait and see what happens after this contract. Your supervisors and managers in operations are about to get squeezed. Sups won't get any stock anymore and managers will get less. On top of this they will pay more for their medical again. Watch

 

[Anonymous 10]

What other locals are saying no? I heard 804 is suggesting no.

Local 804 is a train wreck they have nothing but problems. I love their members but that local is a train wreck.

 

[Asskicker]

​https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151450451422304&set=o.161346104027154&type=1&ref=nf

 

[kingOFchester]

dcf

 

[14ups]

Local 287 They didn't get to finish whether they were in support or not Of this contract All the membership was so pissed They tore up the contract Left it on the floor and walked out So might be safe to say that it's going to be a no vote What happened are Local they have lost their back bone To say the least Can't wait for reelection time Let's clean house boys

 

[TimeForChange]

Based on posts here on browncafe, and based on posts on the "Vote No on UPS Contract" facebook page, https://www.facebook.com/groups/161346104027154/?fref=ts here is what I see so far:

Local officers recommending a YES vote on the national TA:
(edited by TFC)

Local officers recommending a NO vote on the national TA:
(edited by TFC)

I just now saw a post on the "Vote No on UPS Contract" facebook page, that New Jersey Local 177 recommends a YES vote, as was expected, based on what 177 members have been posting.

After making a correction, and adding 287 to the NO list, as per kingOFchester, below, this is now what it looks like so far, with almost 200 Locals still to be due to come out one way of the other, so to speak

Thanks for the input, k OF c

Local officers recommending a YES vote on the national TA:
707
623
952
384
177

Local officers recommending a NO vote on the national TA:
89
804
30
287

 

[kingOFchester]

I just now saw a post on the "Vote No on UPS Contract" facebook page, that New Jersey Local 177 recommends a YES vote, as was expected, based on what 177 members have been posting. So the early score is now 4 to 4, as far as I can tell.

I would put 287 as a no.

 

[TimeForChange]

I had misunderstood something somebody posted on the Vote No on UPS Contract facebook page, so I had moved Local 384 from the NO list to the YES list, but I have since seen a clarification on that facebook groups page, so I have just now moved 384 back into the NO list.

So here is the latest, corrected version of information I have collected:

Local Unions where officers are recommending a YES vote on the national TA:
707
623
952
177

Local Unions where officers are recommending a NO vote on the national TA:
89
804
30
287
384

https://www.facebook.com/groups/161346104027154/?fref=ts

 

[Catatonic]

I had misunderstood something, so I had moved Local 384 from the NO list to the YES list, but I have seince seen a clarification on the Vote No on UPS Contract facebook page.

So here' is what I have collected:

Local Unions where officers are recommending a YES vote on the national TA:
707
623
952
177

Local Unions where officers are recommending a NO vote on the national TA:
89
804
30
287
384

This is the standings on where the wives of UPS drivers stand:

Local Unions where wives are recommending a YES vote on the national TA:
707
623
952
177
89
30
287
384

Local Unions where wives are recommending a NO vote on the national TA:
804

 

[TimeForChange]

Well, we will soon know who wears the pants

 

[smart girl]

384 is a NO vote get your facts right

 

[CaptainObvious]

I had misunderstood something, so I had moved Local 384 from the NO list to the YES list, but I have seince seen a clarification on the Vote No on UPS Contract facebook page.

So here' is what I have collected:

Local Unions where officers are recommending a YES vote on the national TA:
707
623
952
177

Local Unions where officers are recommending a NO vote on the national TA:
89
804
30
287
384

This is the standings on where the wives of UPS drivers stand:

Local Unions where wives are recommending a YES vote on the national TA:
707
623
952
177
89
30
287
384

Local Unions where wives are recommending a NO vote on the national TA:
804

LMAO!!! Such comedian since you've retired Hoaxter......hope it's treating you well!

 

[Catatonic]

384 is a NO vote get your facts right

Does your wife agree with that?

Are you sure you are a smart girl?

 

[dialup]

Does your wife agree with that?

Are you sure you are a smart girl?

Why don't you go spend some time with your wife as opposed to on a UPS forum after you retired. What you think doesn't matter, go live your golden years instead of wasting them doing the same thing you did at work: troll BC.

Leave UPS to the UPSERS.

 

[realbrown1]

Current list so far as we know:

Recommending YES:
707
623
952
177

Recommending NO:
89
804
30
287
384
249

Not as unanimous as we were led to believe.

 

[opie]

Local 177 is part of the yes group. But the shop stewards have been saying vote NO!

 

[oldupsman]

I still think it will.
Been through too many ... Until it changes, I'll stick with history.
​

Well Hoax, you're right, this isn't our first rodeo. But you got to admit this is the first time I've seen some serious dissent.
Don't know if it's enough to get stopped. And not to sound like a tough guy but this is one vote my wife always let me control.
About the only one though.