Discussion in 'Current Events' started by moreluck, Mar 23, 2019.
Yes, and in terms of how long the investigation went on I'd still say that information is new.
Once source cited.
What's the matter couldn't get any screen shots from the bathroom stall at Breitbart, so this crap was the next best thing?
Yet Judicial Watch was accurate in this case.
They file for information using Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials.
You find it hard to believe they're all Democrats, other than Mueller?
You're a Democrat
wow . that sheds some serious light on this witch hunt
only guy I've seen that wear his pants up to his diaphragm
Oh my God! Angry democrats!!!!
Some even donated $750!!!!!!
Yeah, no bias or conflict of interest there. Move along now.
Seriously? I donate that much to casinos every election cycle. You’re talking about millionaires. $750 isn’t even a night on the town.
I'm talking about their political bias, not their contributions. Page and Strzok were on the team until their texts came out. Weissmann was in big time with the Clintons. Might as well have asked the KKK to run a trial of a black man.
I’m sure they looked for Trump supporters to man the team but they were all too high on oxy to pass the bar.
The article made a big deal out of their monetary contributions
and then you did too.
They tried to get Devin Nunez but he had his head buried on presidential arse.
Meanwhile your guys are screwing little girls on Fantasy Island.
I'm sensing you guys think you're going to lose in 2020. Ask @Box Ox why.
Judicial watch is amazing.
And yet I’m supposed to subsidize your employees healthcare while you piss away thousands a year on nights out. Bourgeois liberals are funny.
Separate names with a comma.