realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Can you see the whole t-shirt?
X-ray vision?
I thought so, all talk.
All smack talk.
My Prayers Have Been Answered,.....THANK YOU!!!
- Thread starter Spongebob1
- Start date
X-ray vision?
I thought so, all talk.
All smack talk.
badsporh
He who is not with us, is against us.
That is for an administrative law judge to decide, but the fact that the NLRB sustained his appeal to D.C. is HUGE!! The NLRB sustains appeals only 1.6% of the time. That's 16 times out of 1000 (for any UPS management on here). So the fact that they did proves that they believe that brother****** has a VERY strong case.
Bubblehead
My Senior Picture
As I read it, "absent settlement", it will be furthered to an administrative law judge for a hearing.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
The part where it talks of his termination, it says that his appeal is sustained (meaning he wins).
Because it says he was fired for union and protective concerted activities.
Last edited by a moderator:
badsporh
He who is not with us, is against us.
I think it's safe to assume that the LAST thing UPS wants is this pro-union advocate walking back into their building. So I don't think there will be any settlement here.
badsporh
He who is not with us, is against us.
He BARELY lost an election 14 months ago to Betty friend, a 30 year incumbent who was waging her own personal war on him for running against her. So, there's that.
Bubblehead
My Senior Picture
Wouldn't be the first time.
Remember, UPS hates bad publicity and liability worse.
Bubblehead
My Senior Picture
Now I don't know who @Spongebob1 is????
badsporh
He who is not with us, is against us.
I also think Rob won't settle with UPS. What Local 538 and UPS did to him was criminal. The only way the rank and file can be made aware of the collusion and corruption that exists is to have the courts rule against UPS here. Any settlement would surly include a gag order, and I don't see Rob ever going for that.
badsporh
He who is not with us, is against us.
5habits100
Well-Known Member
Ok slappy
5habits100
Well-Known Member
hyena
Well-Known Member
I hope he wins
badsporh
He who is not with us, is against us.
It doesn't mean that he wins just yet. It means that the National Labor Relations Board in Washington D.C. believes that strong evidence exists that UPS violated the National Labor Relations Act when they fired brother ******* last January. So "absent a settlement", this case will proceed to an administrative law judge for adjudication. When that administrative law judge finds in brother ******** favor, UPS will in all likelihood appeal it.
Whatbrownwontdoforyou
Well-Known Member
What did he officially get fired for?
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
You should apologize now for making accusations where you don't have any proof of any wrongdoing.
But you won't.
Because you are one of the OG's attack chiauaus here on BC.
badsporh
He who is not with us, is against us.
Failure to follow methods instructions and procedures.
Bubblehead
My Senior Picture
Seeing that the company advertises that there are 340 methods (I think there are
many more), how hard would that be to allege?
BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
You must be missing the word "denying" being used 3 times.
All so, the part about sustaining one charge because it is "arguable".
Good luck with that.
That's not what UPS terminated him for.
Repeatedly.
Basically, over-all job performance.
They're called the "340 Methods". That's just the name.
-Bug-
