New Congress

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Indeed. It wasn't "repeal and replace" It was "repeal and we'll get back to you about a replacement" And that was the last you heard about a replacement. The ACA was immediately hammered with half truths and distortions from the Right . Why? Because the Right knew that it was a good deal and people once they stopped listening to the lies, distortions and scare tactics and educated themselves on how it actually worked saw it's potential and at the very least gave it the benefit of the doubt. It's not an easy program to understand but it doesn't take an MBA to understand it either.
Really? It was a good deal for the very poor. It's a good deal for those with preexisting conditions. It's not a good deal for everyone else, who saw their premiums and deductibles rise while the amount covered lessened.
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Yes timing is everything. Firing sessions after the election now that the Democrats have the house and means to impeach would show obstruction if he tried to stop the investigation now.
SMH...Hate has instilled some mighty big plans for ya.
Your dreams will be shattered.
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Typical baby boomer.
The me generation.
Bunch of liberals.
You got it bassackwards Drivel.
You da liberal now . Keep the money machine churnin' for the ustacould liberals turned conservatives. We tightened up after we got done spendin' all the greatest generations money.
What a ride .. had it all and still takin'. Thanks sucka!
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Your diabetes is a preexisting condition. Now when you return will you expect the healthcare system to provide treatment for your diabetes and if so how will it be payed for?

assuming he was not born with the diabetes it would have developed while he was covered by the healthcare system?
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
One thing we won't see is Devon Nunes running back and forth from the WH armed with new instructions from the Trump administration. And since he will no longer be in a position to stop any further investigation we will have an opportunity to see how he and his fellow GOP congressman respond . if what is uncovered is highly incriminating Nunes himself my be subject to investigation regarding possible obstruction of justice. Remember the old saying......"Payback's a bitch".

Meanwhile the liberals are going back and forth to the home of Soro's getting new instructions on how to destroy this country.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
So by that theory, Benghazi yielded absolutely nothing?

Even you have to agree that what Nunez was doing was highly irregular.

I don't know if you have noticed but political investigations rarely produce anything and the players in those investigations always act in a manner the other side views as irregular?
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Now if he does have something and he released it before the elections, then what would you have said?

I would have said it would have leaked much sooner then the date it was released. I would have said that one of the many groups and congressional inquiries would have produced the same information and leaked it.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Please point us toward the public information that says that he has nothing. Given Cohen's, Manafort's and other's willingness to cooperate fully in exchange for a lighter sentence and the willingness of DOJ to give it to them tells you that they most definitely have something.

yes lying and tax fraud on the part of the parties you mentioned. oh and Russians that will never stand trial in this country . conviction without trial the best results a prosecuter can hope for.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
assuming he was not born with the diabetes it would have developed while he was covered by the healthcare system?
If you were to apply for health insurance from a new carrier you cannot be denied coverage on the basis of having a medical condition that was incurred prior to applying for coverage and the carrier can no longer increase the applicants premiums due to the existence of that condition.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Florida just voted to allow felons to vote. Wow, there goes that state. Soon the criminals will outnumbered law abiding citizens. Then they could elect criminals.

that should have been decided at the federal level. now you have felons and illegals voting in elections due to states and localities making up these absurd rules.
 
Top