Not at all. Don't you get tired of defending one goofy candidate after another? I've said it before. I would have been intrigued with a Mitch Daniels or John Huntsman, but that doesn't seem to be in the cards. As it is, republicans seem to just want a messenger of their vitriol. And hypocrisy and double standard? You don't see that in Newt? Or is it that you see it in Obama and think doubling down with a negative somehow makes it a positive?
Congratulations you finally mustered up the courage to almost admit that zer0bama is a hypocrite that uses double standards. Yes, Newt does it too, never denied that. I have also said more than once that Newt was not my choice and there were many political actions he has taken that I do not like.
I too would have liked to have heard more from Daniels and Huntsman, but that was not to be and why I don't really know.
I do get tired of defending one after another from ridiculous claims that are based on leftist vitriol twisting of facts and down right lies. What I do find funny is that the only one's you call down are the people that argue from the right side of the spectrum, yet claim yourself to be a middle of the roader.
What this right leaning independent wants is a candidate that tells it like it is and is upfront and honest and determined to help the USA get back on it's feet and healthy again. If I thought that anyone of the remaining four fit that bill, I would have volunteered my time and money to fully support them. I am still waiting.
Only in black jack is doubling down considered a good play and that doesn't always come to be. What I do see is zer0bama's hypocrisy and double standards on a regular basis and no one from the left is recognizing them for what they are and they sure don't condemn him for them.