Our lying President

[Benben]

Donna Brazil's, head of the DNC at the time, admitted they rigged the Democrat nomination against Bernie Sanders for Hillary. Where's the investigation into that?

Where is your proof?

Well certainly if there's irregularities in an election there should be a special counsel. We all know that. No evidence yet of Russian collusion but we know from Brazile, Wasserman-Schultz, and Podesta's hacked emails that the Democrat side was tainted. So where's the special counsel to investigate? Bernie Sanders supporters were disenfranchised.

Ah there it is! The hacked emails by the Russians! Those released by Assange, received from Russian hackers, the ones which Stone referred to as, "podesta's time in the barrel" days before the Wikileaks release. The ones released to bury Billy Bush's, "grab them by the pusillanimous," tape. All following the entire Tump for President circus clowns meeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya who was, but wasn't a lawyer who only talked about the Magnitsky Act but only after Trump Sr. "didn't" write out Jr.'s "official" statement which he said was his but days after he released his own emails showing it was a meeting about dirt on Hillary.

 

[vantexan]

There are very general rules about timing and whether the party can have a closed primary but thats about it. They are not regulated anything like actual elections for state and national offices. Even if the democratic party did "rig" the primary in Clinton's favor that's not against the law.

Tell that to her opponent's supporters. Just part and parcel of why she was possibly the most crooked Presidential candidate in history.

 

[vantexan]

Where is your proof?



Ah there it is! The hacked emails by the Russians! Those released by Assange, received from Russian hackers, the ones which Stone referred to as, "podesta's time in the barrel" days before the Wikileaks release. The ones released to bury Billy Bush's, "grab them by the pusillanimous," tape. All following the entire Tump for President circus clowns meeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya who was, but wasn't a lawyer who only talked about the Magnitsky Act but only after Trump Sr. "didn't" write out Jr.'s "official" statement which he said was his but days after he released his own emails showing it was a meeting about dirt on Hillary.

Can you point to one thing above that was illegal by the Trump campaign? As for proof ask Brazile. She was only the DNC chairman.

 

[Jones]

Tell that to her opponent's supporters. Just part and parcel of why she was possibly the most crooked Presidential candidate in history.

You're just jabbering now. What primary election law do you think Clinton broke?

 

[vantexan]

You're just jabbering now. What primary election law do you think Clinton broke?

OK, the DNC was broke. According to Brazile they made a deal with Clinton to let her essentially take over the DNC in exchange for giving the DNC millions. But then her campaign took donations made to the DNC outside of donations made directly to her campaign. This gave her campaign more money but was in violation of campaign finance laws. But no one is going after her for it. Just like everything else. I think the Clintons have too much dirt on people.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

They are being nominated for the general election, and every state has laws governing the process.

Not a particular good sidestep and does not address the campaigning arm of the Dims.
You're are not arguing with dum-dums this time.
If I may suggest ... just drop it.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

OK, the DNC was broke. According to Brazile they made a deal with Clinton to let her essentially take over the DNC in exchange for giving the DNC millions. But then her campaign took donations made to the DNC outside of donations made directly to her campaign. This gave her campaign more money but was in violation of campaign finance laws. But no one is going after her for it. Just like everything else. I think the Clintons have too much dirt on people.

Dude, your candidate won because of the DNC shenanigans!!!
The country is much better off than if the wacko Socialist had won.
Don't be a sore 'winner' like the Dims.

 

[vantexan]

Not a particular good sidestep and does not address the campaigning arm of the Dims.
You're are not arguing with dum-dums this time.
If I may suggest ... just drop it.

Just want to point out the how crooked they are. Someone arguing it's ok to be crooked in the nominating process isn't exactly a win for democracy.

 

[vantexan]

Dude, your candidate won because of the DNC shenanigans!!!
The country is much better off than if the wacko Socialist had won.
Don't be a sore 'winner' like the Dims.

The wacko socialist wouldn't have stood a chance in the general election. If so then we wouldn't have had all of the weeping and wailing and the Mueller investigation. But let an election be close and they're going to scream "rigged" if it doesn't go their way. I give you Florida and Georgia as proof.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Just want to point out the how crooked they are. Someone arguing it's ok to be crooked in the nominating process isn't exactly a win for democracy.

Your argument is sensible but not based in Legality.
It's the low-life Dims ... what the hell do you expect?

 

[vantexan]

Your argument is sensible but not based in Legality.
It's the low-life Dims ... what the hell do you expect?

I expect to show low information voters who they are voting for.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

I expect to show low information voters who they are voting for.

They don't listen to you and honestly, I don't blame them.

 

[Jones]

OK, the DNC was broke. According to Brazile they made a deal with Clinton to let her essentially take over the DNC in exchange for giving the DNC millions. But then her campaign took donations made to the DNC outside of donations made directly to her campaign. This gave her campaign more money but was in violation of campaign finance laws. But no one is going after her for it. Just like everything else. I think the Clintons have too much dirt on people.

Even if what you say is true campaign finance laws regulate the use of money in federal elections, they don't apply to party primaries.

 

[vantexan]

Even if what you say is true campaign finance laws regulate the use of money in federal elections, they don't apply to party primaries.

Uh, yup, except she was taking donations to the DNC for her presidential campaign, in clear violation. The rigging against Bernie was her doing things behind the scenes in the primaries as she had control over DNC activities according to Brazile.

 

[newfie]

Where is your proof?

where is yours? oh thats right if you say we listen to too much fox news then you can just make up whatever you want without providing any proof.

 

[newfie]

You're just jabbering now. What primary election law do you think Clinton broke?

collusion with the DNC to deny Bernie a fair primary

 

[vantexan]

They don't listen to you and honestly, I don't blame them.

Let's keep those low information voters in their place!

 

[Jones]

Uh, yup, except she was taking donations to the DNC for her presidential campaign, in clear violation. The rigging against Bernie was her doing things behind the scenes in the primaries as she had control over DNC activities according to Brazile.

This what you said:

Donna Brazil's, head of the DNC at the time, admitted they rigged the Democrat nomination against Bernie Sanders for Hillary. Where's the investigation into that?

Well certainly if there's irregularities in an election there should be a special counsel. We all know that. No evidence yet of Russian collusion but we know from Brazile, Wasserman-Schultz, and Podesta's hacked emails that the Democrat side was tainted. So where's the special counsel to investigate? Bernie Sanders supporters were disenfranchised.

Oh, it's ok to screw over opponents in the primaries? Got it.

You were clearly trying to say that they broke the law by rigging the primary against Bernie. Now you're just deflecting.

 

[Sportello]

Typical day in Finland:

 

[newfie]

Typical day in Finland:

looking good suzie driver