President Biden

[Fred's Myth]

I love it when all these Climate Change Warriors have a conference.
And they all arrive on their private jets.

Strength through Joy? (interesting.....)

"Everyone was feeling Merry at the Christmas Party, but when she left, they all jumped for Joy!" (kinda like that??)

 

[fishtm2001]

How about this scenario ?
A vacant seat comes open on the Supreme Court. Biden announces on the out set that he is going to nominate a white male.
What is your reaction and would that be considered a racist statement by you?
If so, what is the difference in this and him announcing on the out set the next judge is going to be a black woman?

Kind of like Reagan announcing he would nominate a woman?

 

[BrownFlush]

Kind of like Reagan announcing he would nominate a woman?

You never answered.
You are a racist.

 

[fishtm2001]

When the Senate confirmed Jackson to her previous seat on the U.S. district court in 2013, it was by a unanimous vote.

 

[Fred's Myth]

Kind of like Reagan announcing he would nominate a woman?

Are you having a difficult time differentiating between sexist, and racist?

Try using a dictionary.

 

[BrownFlush]

When the Senate confirmed Jackson to her previous seat on the U.S. district court in 2013, it was by a unanimous vote.

I don't care.
You deflected.

 

[fishtm2001]

"In truth, presidents had long nominated judges—and Supreme Court justices in particular—on the basis of demographics. President Dwight Eisenhower nominated Justice William Brennan because he was Catholic, and the White House believed he needed to shore up support among Catholics. The GOP’s revered President Ronald Reagan campaigned on naming the first woman to the Supreme Court; he followed through with Justice Sandra O’Connor, who was openly selected because of her sex. (By today’s standards, O’Connor—a judge on Arizona’s intermediate court of appeals—was underqualified.) Reagan picked Justice Antonin Scalia because he was Italian American. As White House counsel Peter Wallison later recalled, Reagan wanted a justice of Italian “extraction,” explaining, “We don’t have an Italian American on the court, so we ought to have one.”

Slate

 

[BigUnionGuy]

 

[BrownFlush]

"In truth, presidents had long nominated judges—and Supreme Court justices in particular—on the basis of demographics. President Dwight Eisenhower nominated Justice William Brennan because he was Catholic, and the White House believed he needed to shore up support among Catholics. The GOP’s revered President Ronald Reagan campaigned on naming the first woman to the Supreme Court; he followed through with Justice Sandra O’Connor, who was openly selected because of her sex. (By today’s standards, O’Connor—a judge on Arizona’s intermediate court of appeals—was underqualified.) Reagan picked Justice Antonin Scalia because he was Italian American. As White House counsel Peter Wallison later recalled, Reagan wanted a justice of Italian “extraction,” explaining, “We don’t have an Italian American on the court, so we ought to have one.”

Slate

Deflect.

How about this scenario ?
A vacant seat comes open on the Supreme Court. Biden announces on the out set that he is going to nominate a white male.
What is your reaction and would that be considered a racist statement by you?
If so, what is the difference in this and him announcing on the out set the next judge is going to be a black woman?

Try again?

 

[oldngray]

Ex-clerk of SCOTUS contender said to primp her Wikipedia page and degrade those of her competitors

A former law clerk for a potential nominee to the Supreme Court took to Wikipedia over the last week to edit his former boss' biography, as well as those of her competitors.

news.yahoo.com

 

[BigUnionGuy]

 

[Babagounj]

Biden will watch the sanctions for 30 days to see what effect they have.
Unfortunately, this war will be over in less time.

 

[UnionStrong]

Biden will watch the sanctions for 30 days to see what effect they have.
Unfortunately, this war will be over in less time.

Democrats suck, and Biden is an incompetent corpse.

 

[BigUnionGuy]

 

[Box Ox]

A majority says Biden's first year was a failure, a new poll finds

President Biden is at just 39% approval. "These are sort of rock-bottom numbers," said the director of the survey, which was conducted before Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

www.npr.org

"Rising inflation, a continuing pandemic, a foreign policy misstep in Afghanistan and Democratic infighting all marred President Biden's first year, and now a majority of respondents to a new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll say his first year was a "failure."

In all, 56% said Biden's first year in office was a failure, versus just 39% who said it was a success."

 

[zubenelgenubi]

A majority says Biden's first year was a failure, a new poll finds

President Biden is at just 39% approval. "These are sort of rock-bottom numbers," said the director of the survey, which was conducted before Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

www.npr.org

"Rising inflation, a continuing pandemic, a foreign policy misstep in Afghanistan and Democratic infighting all marred President Biden's first year, and now a majority of respondents to a new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll say his first year was a "failure."

In all, 56% said Biden's first year in office was a failure, versus just 39% who said it was a success."

View attachment 374341

39% of people completely out of touch with reality. Ouch.

 

[DELACROIX]

View attachment 374331

...and can’t return it...

 

[BlackFriday]

A majority says Biden's first year was a failure, a new poll finds

President Biden is at just 39% approval. "These are sort of rock-bottom numbers," said the director of the survey, which was conducted before Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

www.npr.org

"Rising inflation, a continuing pandemic, a foreign policy misstep in Afghanistan and Democratic infighting all marred President Biden's first year, and now a majority of respondents to a new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll say his first year was a "failure."

In all, 56% said Biden's first year in office was a failure, versus just 39% who said it was a success."

View attachment 374341

@rickyb

 

[fishtm2001]

Ex-clerk of SCOTUS contender said to primp her Wikipedia page and degrade those of her competitors

A former law clerk for a potential nominee to the Supreme Court took to Wikipedia over the last week to edit his former boss' biography, as well as those of her competitors.

news.yahoo.com

Jackson’s 8.9 years of prior judicial experience is more than four of the justices currently on the court—Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Elena Kagan, and Amy Coney Barrett—had combined. It's also more experience than 4 of the last 10 justices had at their confirmations, or 9 of the last 17, or 43 of the 58 appointed since 1900.

 

[Fred's Myth]

Jackson’s 8.9 years of prior judicial experience is more than four of the justices currently on the court—Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Elena Kagan, and Amy Coney Barrett—had combined. It's also more experience than 4 of the last 10 justices had at their confirmations, or 9 of the last 17, or 43 of the 58 appointed since 1900.

From the article quoted above: "Jackson recently faced scrutiny over her judicial record, which includes high-profile rulings that were later overruled by higher courts."

Prior experience isn't always all it's cracked up to be.