Put some REAL Teeth in 9.5!

[Local 705 for life]

They want us to tell them whether THEY will violate....

I don't see it as my responsibility???

I argue with my center manager all the time, when he claims that "we violated 9.5"???

That's the mindset of management, we're guilty until proven innocent.

 

[Local 705 for life]

I would always tell ride with me. That usually worked. Or I would tell to have IT to ride with me.

 

[542thruNthru]

They want us to tell them whether THEY will violate....

I don't see it as my responsibility???

I argue with my center manager all the time, when he claims that "we violated 9.5"???

That's the mindset of management, we're guilty until proven innocent.

I tell my center manager all the time.
"I am not allowed to dispatch myself which you have made clear on numerous occasions"

That really sets him off.

 

[Frankie's Friend]

Personally, I find the present language to have ample "teeth".....if you have the fortitude and the game to enact "the process"???

Your new BA is ready bro dude.

 

[Frankie's Friend]

Quite simple really.

It is called a clock.

Tell him.
9 hrs 31 minutes =s OV9.5 @Dragon.

 

[35years]

Simple solution ...
1. 9.5 list is automagic unless you want off.
2. No driver on the 9.5 list will be disciplined for bringing back stops as missed after completing 9 hours of work and informing management by the 6th hour.

 

[wilberforce15]

Simpler solution. 9.5 list is automagic with no choice to be on or off. Every route, every day, in every center, must be under 9.5 or face triple-pay for extra time, or no discipline for bringing stops back.

 

[542thruNthru]

Simpler solution. 9.5 list is automagic with no choice to be on or off. Every route, every day, in every center, must be under 9.5 or face triple-pay for extra time, or no discipline for bringing stops back.

As much as I like being on the 9.5 list. I don't feel like teamsters should force other members to join it. I believe this proposal would take away people's choice for OT.

 

[wilberforce15]

It would take away the choice for OT. It would probably also save 1000 divorces a year and create ft jobs better than any other measure.

 

[Local 705 for life]

It would take away the choice for OT. It would probably also save 1000 divorces a year and create ft jobs better than any other measure.

Big brown can no longer deceive anyone it's clearly out open the is keeping its profit margin the same as it always been. Now they are turning on its partner in crime all management employees are not safe from its destructive mentally and desperation for profits.

 

[542thruNthru]

It would take away the choice for OT. It would probably also save 1000 divorces a year and create ft jobs better than any other measure.

So we are now making choices for people? In the 4 centers I've been in there are more people that want OT then don't. Yes it would create more fulltime jobs but it would also put a ton of strain on many members that want or need IT.

And as I'm sure you know. Money issues are the main cause of divorce.

 

[Local 705 for life]

So we are now making choices for people? In the 4 centers I've been in there are more people that want OT then don't. Yes it would create more fulltime jobs but it would also put a ton of strain on many members that want or need IT. They are sealing the company fate. They are transferring wealth internationally and all kind of mergers are being made to position it self on many platforms of finance. They consuming companies on a very alarming rate.

And as I'm sure you know. Money issues are the main cause of divorce.

 

[542thruNthru]

Um.... ok. This has what to do with 9.5?

 

[wilberforce15]

The $14/hr guys need full time jobs more than guys making $36/hr need OT.

If they can't make it on $80k, they're not gonna make it on $100k either because it's a behavior problem, not an income problem.

 

[Local 705 for life]

Um.... ok. This has what to do with 9.5?

I am sorry the point was that because of wealth migration they will probably easily give in to most of the negotiations demands. It would actually be to there benefit after what is happening to management incentive programs

 

[Local 705 for life]

The center teams have been reduced to extra drivers already and they will continue to see more window time.

 

[DOK]

Any driver on the 9.5 is to be out no later than 9.5 hours. (Until such time driver elects to no longer ne on 9.5)
If there are stops that do not get delivered, that is on Management for failing to have a 9.5 hour day on the truck.
If Management wants the remaining stops delivered, THEY will have to deliver them, (though grievances cannot be filed for Management working) not send another driver out, unless one who is not on 9.5 wants to deliver them.
Anyone else feel this is a good way to deal with the 9.5 issue?

It’s already this way in some locals, so yeah sounds good.

 

[35years]

I am sorry the point was that because of wealth migration they will probably easily give in to most of the negotiations demands. It would actually be to there benefit after what is happening to management incentive programs

Who cares about MIP

 

[Local 705 for life]

You stated you were retired.

You also said you purchased US stock at $10 years ago.

Are you retired management?

I spent a couple a years as a part-time supervisor and went driving after that sir.

 

[35years]

I spent a couple a years as a part-time supervisor and went driving after that sir.

Then on to management ?

Just wondering where you are coming from

A lot of management shills pretending to be rank and file around contract time.