Guess I was "observed" on route today. Passed so not real concerned, but manager had our hourly safety committee guy with him. Isn't that a violation of the contract? Maybe it's the new contract.
We call those guys...Rats, snakes or suckasses!..Take your pick!....Thats a pile of crap! They should be thrown out of the union. These mo fo abuse us, every chance they get. Now they use, our so called " union brothers" against us! Screw them. and the scab, with the union card!.....You just dont do that!!!Yes, he's on the clock. I'd like to give him a friendly warning he is in violation. Basically a pretty nice guy.
And deserving so.They actually gave a guy high praise this morning along with a cup. Like I said, I try to do thing right so not a big deal to me, but someone else might hang him out to dry.
I look at them as a sellouts! dont cross enemy lines.....PERIOD!If there was an hourly with the supe, there cannot be any discipline as the result of anything observed. Supe might say something to correct something egregious, but cannot hand out a warning letter or verbal warning.
I look at those as freebies.
They actually gave a guy high praise this morning along with a cup. Like I said, I try to do thing right so not a big deal to me, but someone else might hang him out to dry.
In our local our ba stoped that in such a flash that it's funny. The local appoints people to the safety committee and takes them off.Guess I was "observed" on route today. Passed so not real concerned, but manager had our hourly safety committee guy with him. Isn't that a violation of the contract? Maybe it's the new contract.
The union has the right to man the safety committee not the company.A few years back, everyone, including me, quit the committee because of what it was being turned into. This guy is fairly new, thinks he can accomplish something that equates to actual safety on that committee. I know better.
Get the chance I'll mention this to him. After that it's his rear not mine.
It's in that crappy ta you don't like? What do you think about that better language?The union has the right to man the safety committee not the company.
That hourly may be the safety co-chair and they must never be a witness to "on areas". That situation creates alot of resentment among hourlies.
Call your BA (and steward) and tell them to make that stop. It can really generate animosity towards the "witness" and create a hostile work environment.
That language is even stronger in the new TA. Often, the "witness" is the company snitch and breaks more rules than the rest.
No. There's a few good things in the TA. I said that yesterday if you reread it.It's in that crappy ta you don't like? What do you think about that better language?
That's wrong. Those observation documents don't (better not) have anyone's name on it but the "observer" has to ask the OMS to look on the computer and find out where "John Doe" the driver is and when the sheets are turned in (and they are given to mgmnt to be documented they did so many per week) they know who did what.Hell our safety committee members usually spend their 8 hour requests observing other drivers. One was even a steward.
A driver In my center turned in a vacation day request was denied the day due to staffing. Then on said day requested a safety sucka$& that knew same route was in building doing "safety" hours.That's wrong. Those observation documents don't (better not) have anyone's name on it but the "observer" has to ask the OMS to look on the computer and find out where "John Doe" the driver is and when the sheets are turned in (and they are given to mgmnt to be documented they did so many per week) they know who did what.
We cut routes because staffing is "tight" but they can take a pet driver and work him on "safety" garbage and leave drivers out until 8-9pm? Is that safe? That's.