SCOTUS

[moreluck]

Maybe another pick??!!

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg fractures 3 ribs in fall

 

[El Correcto]

Maybe another pick??!!

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg fractures 3 ribs in fall

Im glad she fell, wish it was fatal. She is standing in the way of serious abortion reform and saving lives.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Im glad she fell, wish it was fatal. She is standing in the way of serious abortion reform and saving lives.

There you go! That's a good Antifa spirit!

 

[BrownArmy]

Im glad she fell, wish it was fatal. She is standing in the way of serious abortion reform and saving lives.

Classy.

 

[burrheadd]

Im glad she fell, wish it was fatal. She is standing in the way of serious abortion reform and saving lives.

SMH!!

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Classy.

Almost as classless as the Dim's handling of the Kavanaugh hearings.

 

[El Correcto]

SMH!!

Classy.

 

[brownmonster]

Im glad she fell, wish it was fatal. She is standing in the way of serious abortion reform and saving lives.

That's right. Pro life means only fetuses.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Damn it all!
She was released from the hospital!
WTH!!!!

 

[BrownArmy]

 

[Babagounj]

Has anyone checked to see if she is actual human ?
Maybe she's the The Energizer Bunny in disguise.

 

[BrownArmy]

Has anyone checked to see if she is actual human ?
Maybe she's the The Energizer Bunny in disguise.

Her husband passed away, this is what she has.

She'll be in the seat until she dies.

 

[Babagounj]

Her husband passed away, this is what she has.

She'll be in the seat until she dies.

Is it possible to bury her in her seat?

 

[BrownArmy]

Is it possible to bury her in her seat?

Relax, Trump will be Prez for another six years, there's no rush.

 

[BrownArmy]

RGB - NOW AVAILABLE TO RENT ON DEMAND

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Relax, Trump will be Prez for another six years, there's no rush.

A sincere prognostication?

 

[moreluck]

Maybe the Dems. should impose term limits for themselves.....

Curt Levey: Liberals latest Supreme Court scheme? You won't believe this one...

 

[Old Man Jingles]

I am very impressed by this ruling by the SCOTUS!
It reasoned that discrimination based on sexual orientation is a ‘subset of sex discrimination.'”

SCOTUS Rules 6-3 That LGBTQ People Are Protected Under Federal Employment Discrimination Laws - Towleroad Gay News

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that LGBTQ people are protected under federal employment discrimination laws, specifically Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

www.towleroad.com

 

[Old Man Jingles]

I am very impressed by this ruling by the SCOTUS!
It reasoned that discrimination based on sexual orientation is a ‘subset of sex discrimination.'”

SCOTUS Rules 6-3 That LGBTQ People Are Protected Under Federal Employment Discrimination Laws - Towleroad Gay News

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that LGBTQ people are protected under federal employment discrimination laws, specifically Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

www.towleroad.com

Thomas, Aleto and Kavanaugh voted against this ruling.

I don't hold it against them ... their dissent was based on the fact that this is essentially writing law from the bench.
Their contention is that Congress should do their job (good luck on that!!!) and pass a law that defines these inclusions.
This ruling passed today is a landmark case that only changes laws in 17 states as the other 33 states already have this as a law, passed by their legislatures.

 

[oldngray]

Thomas, Aleto and Kavanaugh voted against this ruling.

I don't hold it against them ... their dissent was based on the fact that this is essentially writing law from the bench.
Their contention is that Congress should do their job (good luck on that!!!) and pass a law that defines these inclusions.
This ruling passed today is a landmark case that only changes laws in 17 states as the other 33 states already have this as a law, passed by their legislatures.

Agreed. The decision is mostly symbolic since most states already have laws for these situations but my issue with it is the writing from the bench. The law as written didn't include sexual orientation and it is up to Congress to write a new law. Not have judges do it for them. The real concern is that things don't get twisted to mean extra rights instead of equal rights.