DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Yes.Would you classify the oil, gas and coal industry tax breaks as "marxist government subsidies"?
You think your deflection is helping your case?
Yes.Would you classify the oil, gas and coal industry tax breaks as "marxist government subsidies"?
Not deflection. You're comparing renewable to other other energy sources. I think it's silly and inaccurate to label tax breaks as " marxist", regardless of which industry they apply to, but hey, a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. So, oil, gas, coal, renewables all get tax breaks. Its illogical to say one is better or worse because of tax incentives: they all get tax incentives.Yes.
You think your deflection is helping your case?
By your own admission it is a terrible investment without marxist government subsidies for an inferior method of energy production.Not deflection. You're comparing renewable to other other energy sources. I think it's silly and inaccurate to label tax breaks as " marxist", regardless of which industry they apply to, but hey, a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. So, oil, gas, coal, renewables all get tax breaks. Its illogical to say one is better or worse because of tax incentives: they all get tax incentives.
Inferior to what?By your own admission it is a terrible investment without marxist government subsidies for an inferior method of energy production.
What is it not inferior to?Inferior to what?
Well, now you're just being silly. Well, not just now, but now, as well.What is it not inferior to?
So you've got nothing.Well, now you're just being silly. Well, not just now, but now, as well.
No YOU have nothing. I asked you first, what's it inferior to, and instead of answering my question, you asked me a question. I'm the questioner here and I demand an answer to my question, not a question to my question. How dare you? Shame on you. I'm very upset with you now.So you've got nothing.
Okay. Carry on.
Okay.No YOU have nothing. I asked you first, what's it inferior to, and instead of answering my question, you asked me a question. I'm the questioner here and I demand an answer to my question, not a question to my question. How dare you? Shame on you. I'm very upset with you now.
Up North we have 10s of thousands of wind turbines that work all Winter long. Even in -20 temps. Just how long do you think a wind turbine blade will last? 20 to 30 years.Wind power is great.
Except as the UK found out some years ago, a week of really cold weather froze the turbines.
Just when they needed the extra power , there was none.
Then there is the retirement of the turbines blades.
There is no recycling of them , so they get buried in landfills.
Why do all the turbines have to be so big ?
Those big ones are limited by the force of the wind, some windy days that can't be used at all.
Wouldn't a series of smaller turbines work better ?
Bbbbut all the dead birds! Sad!Up North we have 10s of thousands of wind turbines that work all Winter long. Even in -20 temps. Just how long do you think a wind turbine blade will last? 20 to 30 years.
I am more concerned about the cancer causing aspect of wind power. LOL.Bbbbut all the dead birds! Sad!
then bomb them out of existence instead of stealing resources........So to "save the planet", we are allowing China to build coal burning power plant's left and right, while we are taxed?