Next Day Err
Banned
He’s been drinking again.
Storming the Capitol
- Thread starter Operational needs
- Start date
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
You claimed he committed election fraud.From this Guardian piece:
Trump ally is first to plead guilty in Georgia elections case | Georgia | The Guardian
Former Republican poll watcher Scott Hall pleads guilty to five criminal counts and must testify against co-defendantsamp.theguardian.com
Speaking of things not being a good look… yikes.
I pointed out he was charged with trying to verify the election results.
Then you posted proof I'm right.
You're hilarious.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
I think you've been drinking again, go to bed old man.
Next Day Err
Banned
Awwww he was just trying to haaaalp. Why are liberals such meanies!? Lol
PT Car Washer
Well-Known Member
Had a couple beers after work. Still serviceable for Saturday Air in the AM.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
So you're running away from your BlueAnon conspiracy theory that he was commiting election fraud.
Good, glad I could help you buddy.
Next Day Err
Banned
He was charged with with two counts of election fraud, yes. This isn’t my theory. This is a state RICO case.
Best of luck to your MAGAts.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Yea that's the delusion you BlueAnon conspiracy theorists have pushed.
But what was he convicted of?
Next Day Err
Banned
He? Scott Hall? Pleading guilty results in an automatic conviction.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Convicted of what?
Next Day Err
Banned
Five counts of conspiracy to commit intentional interference with performance of election duties. All misdemeanors.
Next Day Err
Banned
I'm not a lawyer but I believe in a Georgia RICO case the county prosecutor can charge within the scope of the entire state if the alleged crimes were connected to where the bulk of the alleged crimes were conducted. Going off memory there only.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
So you admit he wasn't convicted of election fraud, and rather was convicted of accessing election tabulations, just like I said.
I'm proud of you for abandoning your election fraud conspiracy theory claims Austin.
I'm glad I was here to educate you son.
Next Day Err
Banned
He pleaded the charges down, yes. But the state's case is that Hall was engaging in election fraud at the behest of others but will receive lighter sentencing in exchange for the promise to cooperate with the matter going forward by testifying against others in the RICO case.
We'll have to see how it plays out.
Next Day Err
Banned
Let's get real, @DriveInDriveOut.
Let's assume for just a second that all criminal defendants plead guilty or are found guilty by a jury in this Georgia case. Is that really going to change your mind as to the credibility of this case? I highly doubt it. You've already made up your mind.
Let's assume for just a second that all criminal defendants plead guilty or are found guilty by a jury in this Georgia case. Is that really going to change your mind as to the credibility of this case? I highly doubt it. You've already made up your mind.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Even you aren't delusional enough to think they would let him off for election fraud if they had any evidence or chance at all of convicting him of it.
No, he accepted a plea deal for the only weak thing they can convict him on: trying to verify election results without permission.
Just like I said.
Give up your crazy crackpot conspiracy theory little buddy.
oldngray
nowhere special
They threatened him with 7 felonies to get him to plead guilty to 1 misdemeanor.
Next Day Err
Banned
The state's case is stronger if they can get this guy to squeal rather than simply convicting him of the original felonies and losing his full cooperation with respect to testifying against the other defendants.
You know how this works.
It's not my crazy crackpot conspiracy theory... little buddy. It's the state of Georgia's ongoing RICO case. I'm just trying to gather the facts and learn about the case as it develops. I'm willing to see the thing through to the end without making up my mind as to the particulars of the alleged crimes. There's a lot we apparently don't know with this case. You've made your mind up, clearly. That's ok.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
No it isn't, it's stronger if they can convict him of election fraud. But they can't because there was no fraud.
Give up your crackpot conspiracy theories Austin.
Similar threads
