HUntsman was right about IOWA, how does that make him wrong? 120K republicans couldnt make up their minds and define a clear winner to represent them. Romney, santorum and Paul each came close to 25% each. Heck, gingrich took some votes, bachman took some votes and even cain recieved 56 votes. (at least we know who the stupidest 56 people in iowa were)
He was right. IOWA didnt chose a candidate. It was as confused as you C9ers are on this board.
He will spend his money in states where the people will make a defined choice. You wont see a three way 25% race from this point on.
I still believe he will be out by South Carolina, but his strategy is right on.
By the way, in IOWA, the republicans FAILED. In 2008, the democrats were able to motivate 300K to vote for president Obama, and this year, the republicans were looking to see large increases in voter turnout. Instead, the GOP only brought out 122K, a minor 4K increase from 2008, and that doesnt bode well for GOP hopes in the 2012 presidential race. Hope this doesnt spoil your oatmeal this morning.
Peace.