The Immigration Issue
- Thread starter automated
- Start date
OldUPSDriver
Well-Known Member
Immigration Laws Of What Country ?
1. Only professionals or investors can immigrate to the country. No unskilled laborers will be allowed in. Investors must be able to invest at least 40,000 times the daily average wage. If they can't, they are not allowed in.
2. Immigrants may purchase property, but locations and availability will be limited. Ocean front property cannot be purchased by immigrants. It is exclusively for citizens born in the country.
3. Immigrants cannot vote nor can they be elected to any public office.
4. Immigrants cannot collect any type of government assistance.
5. Immigrants cannot protest the countries government, policies or president.
6. Immigrants cannot display a flag of a foreign country.
7. Immigrants who have illegally entered the country will be found and imprisoned.
Sound kind of harsh? Well, these are laws that are currently part of the Immigration Laws of,
you guessed it,
MEXICO!!!
1. Only professionals or investors can immigrate to the country. No unskilled laborers will be allowed in. Investors must be able to invest at least 40,000 times the daily average wage. If they can't, they are not allowed in.
2. Immigrants may purchase property, but locations and availability will be limited. Ocean front property cannot be purchased by immigrants. It is exclusively for citizens born in the country.
3. Immigrants cannot vote nor can they be elected to any public office.
4. Immigrants cannot collect any type of government assistance.
5. Immigrants cannot protest the countries government, policies or president.
6. Immigrants cannot display a flag of a foreign country.
7. Immigrants who have illegally entered the country will be found and imprisoned.
Sound kind of harsh? Well, these are laws that are currently part of the Immigration Laws of,
you guessed it,
MEXICO!!!
wkmac
Well-Known Member
tieguy
Banned
another reason to take control of our borders
https://web.archive.org/web/20060420214321/http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=12121
https://web.archive.org/web/20060420214321/http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=12121
tieguy
Banned
While Santa Anna may have been the worst terrorist to cross the mexican border this gang from El Salvador is quickly reaching new levels in urban terrorism
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20050328-125306-7868r.htm
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20050328-125306-7868r.htm
wily_old_vet
Well-Known Member
Sloth-getting good at name calling aren't you. Moreluck doesn't agree with your views, she's racist. Tie doesn't agree with your views he's xenophobic. Can't wait to hear what I am since I don't agree with your views either.
OldUPSDriver
Well-Known Member
Ignore it and it will go away.
wily_old_vet said:
Moreluck has displayed her racist attitude more than once in the past, tieguy is clearly a xenophobe. These are observations, not name calling. OldUPSDriver obviously cut and pasted his comment from another site without crediting his source.
I have yet to see any poster come up with an idea of what to do about the immigration issue. Are you aware that the immigration laws with respect to Mexico have changed drastically in the last 50 years? Do you think it is in our best interests to criminalize 12 million+ humans who provide necessary service to our country? Do you think families should be torn apart because a parent is not legal, but a child is?
Here’s what I think: provide a path to citizenship for any native born Mexican that is willing to learn English, pay taxes, hold a job and stay out of trouble with the law. Shoot, why not just let citizens of North America move freely between the borders of the three countries? I don’t have a problem with that, either.
Do you have any ideas?
PS---I find it interesting to note that you disagree with my views, when I haven’t expressed any views until this post.
1chris-craft
Member
i will give you my take on immigration in 1999 my aunt and uncle wanted to move from canada. my uncle was a federal prison guard in canada they had two or three business. it took ten years for them to become americans. i had to sponser them it was like buying four houses at one time. even though they had more money than me. i thought this was alot of work but the usa was not letting people just come in. then sept 11th happened i learned we have different rules for different countries. we donot let in alot of people that we should. my aunt now has condos in palm springs and other places. we need to close the borders then decide fairly what to do with 12 million
tieguy
Banned
Slothrop said:
Interesting irony. The liberal tends to speak out against labeling as they label anyone that disagrees with them.
You couldn't dispute the point that Santa Anna was a terrorist who came across the mexican border and terrorized american settlers therefore you chose to resort to name calling as a last desperate defense.
Checkmate.
wkmac
Well-Known Member
I've heard one of the chief complaints about the illegal immigration problem as being the lack of taxes being paid and there is some truth to this. Although it may have other problems and issues depending on one's personal financial situation, the propsed Fair Tax Act which would eliminate the current income and social security tax along with the various capital gains, corp., estate and other various income taxes and replace it with a national sales tax would for the most part eliminate this problem of purported non-payment of taxes.
As a libertarian I believe that globally and by unalienable right we should be able to transcend national borders at will. However, when you have a type of infrastructure that we have here in the US and likewise for Mexico based on what I've read at the earlier link I posted and at other sites, I can understand the need to have some control and ability to moderate access to that infrastructure. Mexico's rules that I read seem prudent enough and my understanding is the current US rules are likewise similar. Canada may as well be near the same. You know, you would have thought that within NAFTA that this issue got some mention as the heart of any business to begin with is the labor to drive it.
It's also funny to me that with all the union hesteria about all the jobs leaving the US and going south that we'd have so many people annually making the hard trip north and south all the time to find work. Like many, many things we see and here, this may be vastly overblown as well.
JMO.
As a libertarian I believe that globally and by unalienable right we should be able to transcend national borders at will. However, when you have a type of infrastructure that we have here in the US and likewise for Mexico based on what I've read at the earlier link I posted and at other sites, I can understand the need to have some control and ability to moderate access to that infrastructure. Mexico's rules that I read seem prudent enough and my understanding is the current US rules are likewise similar. Canada may as well be near the same. You know, you would have thought that within NAFTA that this issue got some mention as the heart of any business to begin with is the labor to drive it.
It's also funny to me that with all the union hesteria about all the jobs leaving the US and going south that we'd have so many people annually making the hard trip north and south all the time to find work. Like many, many things we see and here, this may be vastly overblown as well.
JMO.
